Discovering the Fourier Transform to Solving for X(jω)

Jncik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the Fourier transform of the function

[tex] x(t)=\left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> &25 - \frac{25}{8}|t-10| &for &|t-10|<8 \\ <br /> &0 &for& |t-10|>8<br /> \end{matrix}\right.[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



we know that

[tex] g(t)=\left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> &1-|t| &for &|t|<1 \\ <br /> &0 &for& |t|>1<br /> \end{matrix}\right.\leftrightarrow X(j\omega) =\left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> &\begin{bmatrix}<br /> {\frac{\frac{sin(\omega)}{2}}{\frac{\omega}{2}}}<br /> \end{bmatrix}^{2} &for &|\omega|<1 \\<br /> &0 &for& |\omega|>1<br /> \end{matrix}\right. [/tex]

we can see that [tex]x(t) = 25g(\frac{1}{8} (t-10))[/tex]

now

[tex]25g(t-10) \leftrightarrow 25 X(j \omega) e^{-j 10 \omega}[/tex]

and

[tex]25g(1/8(t-10)) \leftrightarrow \frac{25}{8} X(j\frac{\omega}{8}) e^{-j 10 \frac{\omega}{8}}[/tex]

is this correct?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Your approach looks fine, but I think you got the factors of 8 in the wrong place. Since it divides t, it should be multiplying ω. Also, I'm not sure where you got the overall factor of 1/8 in front.

There's an error in what you wrote for X(ω), but I assume it's just a typo. It should be sin(ω/2), not (sin ω)/2.
 
Last edited:
Yes you're right

[tex]25g(1/8(t-10)) \leftrightarrow 200 X(j 8 \omega) e^{-j 80 \omega}[/tex]

"Also, I'm not sure where you got the overall factor of 1/8 in front."

isn't 25g(1/8(t-10)) = x(t)?

for g(1/8 t - 10/8) and the first interval I will have

[tex]1 - |\frac{t}{8} - \frac{10}{8}|[/tex] for [tex]|\frac{t}{8} - \frac{10}{8}|<1[/tex]

for the second interval I will get zero as a result

now if I multiply this by 25 I will get the following result for the first interval

[tex]25-\frac{25}{8}|t-10|[/tex] for [tex]|t-10|<8[/tex]

and the second remains 0 but with interval [tex]|t-10|>8[/tex]

which is essentially the x(t)
 
Last edited:
I meant the 8 that you multiplied into the 25 to get 200. I didn't think it should be there, but I just checked the tables and found you were right.
 
thanks I have one more question

I think I'm wrong with my FT calculations[tex]25g(t-10) \leftrightarrow 25 X(j \omega) e^{-j 10 \omega}[/tex]

but I have [tex]25g(\frac{1}{8}(t-10))[/tex]

hence
[tex]25g(1/8(t-10)) \leftrightarrow 200 X(j 8 \omega) e^{-j 10 \omega}[/tex]

I mean I should first find 25 g(1/8 t)

and then

find the final result due to the shifting by 10...but I'm not sure about
 
Last edited:
Good catch. As you suggested, you can look at it as a shift by 10 of g(t/8). I think that's the simplest way.

You could, however, perform the shift first and then the scaling, but it's a bit tricky. The shift would have to be by 10/8, giving you g(t - 10/8). Then when you scale time, you replace t by t/8 to get g(t/8 - 10/8) = g[(t-10)/8]. In the frequency domain, the shift factor would originally be e-j(10/8)ω, and then the scaling would replace ω by 8ω, giving you e-j10ω again.
 
that was a nice alternative

thanks a lot for your help :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K