A Displaying the dimensionless Radiation Transport Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on displaying the Radiation Transport Equation (RTE) in a dimensionless form, specifically incorporating the Planck number, Prandtl number, and Rayleigh number. The original poster seeks assistance after multiple unsuccessful attempts to achieve this. A participant questions the scaling of variables, suggesting that temperature should scale with a reference temperature and lengths with a characteristic length, while also inquiring about the scaling of time. Additionally, there is a request for clarification on how to define the heat flux vector in relation to temperature and its derivatives. Overall, the conversation centers on the complexities of dimensionless representation in fluid dynamics.
BigBoBy17
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Display the Radiation Transport Equation dimensionless
Hallo,
I would like to display the RTE (Radiation Transport Equation) dimensionless. In the picture, the RTE is shown. I would like to have the Planck number (or N) inside at the end. Additionally, the Prandtl number and the Rayleigh number can be inside. I have already many attempts behind me, but I do not get it. Could someone help me and explain it to me? I would be very grateful.
RTE.png

Boby
 

Attachments

  • RTE.png
    RTE.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 114
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you scaling the variables? I assume temperature scales with T_{\mathrm{ref}} and lengths with L; that leaves the question of how you scale time. As you mention Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers, this scaling presumably comes from the momentum equation, which you haven't included in your post.

How do you define \mathbf{q}_R in terms of T and its derivatives?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Historical clarification of the Planck formula of blackbody radiation
Replies
3
Views
1K
A Equipartition of energy in the modes of a resonant cavity
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Physical temperature and antenna temperature
Replies
3
Views
1K
I What happens if you increase μ0 and decrease ϵ0? Or vice versa
2
Replies
68
Views
4K
"Holographic" Display with Rotating Blades
Replies
15
Views
5K
Bernoulli vs. Reynold Transport Theorem Problem for Raincap
Replies
11
Views
3K
I Understanding Parallel Transport
Replies
9
Views
7K
Elevated Geiger Counter Radiation Reading for Envelope?
Replies
26
Views
3K
I Electromagnetic radiation, photons, quantized energy levels
Replies
1
Views
1K
Is hv/kt Dimensionless in Planck's Radiation Law?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top