Distance between maxima of two-slit interference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between the central maximum and the first-order maximum in a two-slit interference experiment using light of wavelength 500 nm. The distance between the first and fourth minima is given as 1.68 cm. The relationship between path differences and slit separation is established using the equations d*sin(θ) = nλ and tan(θ) = x/L. It is confirmed that the first-order maximum is separated from the central maximum by a minimum, and the distances between minima are greater than those between maxima.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of two-slit interference principles
  • Familiarity with wave optics equations, specifically d*sin(θ) = nλ
  • Knowledge of trigonometric relationships in optics, such as tan(θ) = x/L
  • Basic conversion of units, particularly between nanometers and centimeters
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the two-slit interference formula d*sin(θ) = nλ
  • Learn about the relationship between minima and maxima in interference patterns
  • Investigate the impact of wavelength on interference patterns in various mediums
  • Study the concept of path difference in wave optics and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying wave optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of interference patterns in light waves.

PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A light of wavelength 500 nm interferes through a two slit experiment on a screen. The distance between the first minimum and fourth minimum is 1.68 cm. Find the distance between the central maximum and first order maximum.

Homework Equations


d*sin(θ) = nλ = Δ

d = distance between slits
Δ = path difference

sin(θ) = tan(θ)
tan(θ) = x / L

x = distance between orders
L = distance between slits and screen

The Attempt at a Solution



We can find the path difference between the first and fourth minimum by:

(3.5)λ which is 0.000175 cm. (I converted 500 nm to 0.00005 cm).

So we can get: ##\frac{0.000175 cm}{d} = \frac{1.68 cm}{L} = tan(θ_1) = sin(θ_1)##.

We need to find: ##\frac{0.00005 cm}{d} = \frac{x}{L} = tan(θ_2) = sin(θ_2)##

But it doesn't look like we have enough information. How can I solve this? Can I use the ratio d / L to set the equation ##\frac{0.000175}{1.68} = \frac{0.00005}{x}##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Things to think about: Does the wavelength of 500 nm really matter? is the distance between minimums the same as between maximums? Is the first order max next to the central max?"
 
barryj said:
Things to think about: Does the wavelength of 500 nm really matter? is the distance between minimums the same as between maximums? Is the first order max next to the central max?"

I found the distance between minimums is larger than the distancce between maximums. And no, the first order max is not next to the central max because they are separated by a minimum
 
Of course there is a minimum between the central max and the first order max. If you look at the pattern, I think you would see a central bright line, then a dark line, then another bright line, then a dark line and etc, yes. As I recall, the distances get a little larger as you move further away from the center but I doubt this is of concern here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K