Distance travelled by a car considering only air friction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a 3-ton car would travel considering only air friction, starting from an initial speed of 17 km/h. Participants are examining the effects of air resistance on motion, particularly in relation to the car's aerodynamic properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to use the kinematic equation Vf² = Vi² + 2·a·d to find the distance, but some question the appropriateness of this formula due to the variable nature of air resistance. There are discussions about the implications of using a constant acceleration assumption in this context.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to account for air resistance in the calculations. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of air resistance and its dependence on velocity, while others are questioning the original poster's calculations and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the coefficient of friction used may not accurately represent the situation, and there is a suggestion to consider the variable nature of air resistance as speed decreases. There is also a reference to external resources for further understanding.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
Moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums.
TL;DR Summary: Distance traveled by a car considering only air friction?

How much distance would a 3-ton car travel if its initial speed was 17 km/h and we only take into account air's friction? (Assume that the car has an airfoil-like shape, so that the resistance against the air is very low)

I tried to calculate this with the formula Vf² = Vi² + 2·a·d (taking as 0.05 the coefficient of friction of the airfoil-like car against the air) and the resulting distance is 22,84 meters, but it seems too low to me. Am I messing up with something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
I tried to calculate this with the formula Vf² = Vi² + 2·a·d (taking as 0.05 the coefficient of friction of the airfoil-like car against the air)
Air resistance is not like friction, it depends on the velocity. What research have you done into solving problems that involve air resistance? Wikipedia might be a good place to start...

Update with a link -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Lnewqban
You should not use that formula because acceleration is not constant in your case.
Its value will be very high when velocity of the car is still high, but that value will progresively tend to zero at a square ratio as the velocity is degraded by air drag.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and berkeman
Suekdccia said:
I tried to calculate this with the formula Vf² = Vi² + 2·a·d (taking as 0.05 the coefficient of friction of the airfoil-like car against the air)
Solving that formula for d gives me about 17 meters.

Suekdccia said:
and the resulting distance is 22,84 meters, but it seems too low to me. Am I messing up with something?
Our numbers do not agree. Yes, in addition to using the wrong formula, you seem to be messing something up. Please show your work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Here is how you arrive at the equation you used:

The work done ##W## is defined as:
$$W = \int Fdx$$
Knowing that ##F=ma##, the work done based on acceleration is:
$$W= \int madx$$
If we want to know the work based on velocity alone:
$$W = \int madx = \int m\frac{dv}{dt}dx = \int m\frac{dx}{dt}dv = \int mvdv$$
Both equations should give the same amount of work, so:
$$\int_{v_i}^{v_f} mvdv = \int_{x_i}^{x_f} madx$$
$$\frac{1}{2}m(v_f^2 - v_i^2) = ma(x_f - x_i)$$
$$v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2a(x_f - x_i)$$
Which is the equation you used. This assumes that ##F = ma##, where ##a## is constant.

But that is not the case here. The problem identifies the force ##F## that you need to use with the work ##Fdx##. And the work done based on velocity is still ##mvdv##. All you need to do is to equate both as done previously and resolve the integrals. [Hint: the air friction force varies with velocity.]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and topsquark

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K