Divergence in cylindrical/spherical coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the divergence formula in spherical coordinates, specifically addressing the expression for the r-component of divergence. The formula is established as (∇ · A)ₕₐₜᵣ = (1/r²) ∂(r² Aᵣ)/∂r. The participants clarify the contributions from the ±ĥᵣ faces of a small spherical volume, leading to the integral representation of divergence. The transformation from the initial expression to the standard form is emphasized as a straightforward step involving partial differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly divergence
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of partial differentiation
  • Basic concepts of volume integrals in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of divergence in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about the application of the divergence theorem in various coordinate systems
  • Explore the implications of divergence in fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between divergence and physical fields, such as electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and engineering, particularly those studying vector calculus and its applications in fields like fluid dynamics and electromagnetism.

deedsy
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm just having trouble understanding a step in my notes from class.. We're talking about how to derive the divergence in other coordinate systems.

Homework Equations



So, we are deriving this divergence formula in spherical coordinates

\oint \vec{A}\cdot d\vec{A} = \int (∇ \cdot \vec{A}) dv

The Attempt at a Solution



To do that, we create a small unit of spherical-like volume, and see it's contribution to \oint \vec{A}\cdot d\vec{A}. We'll need to do this for all 6 faces of this small volume...and added together, it will give us the divergence formula in spherical coordinates.

So, for our small volume we use in spherical coords, we found that the contribution from the \pm \hat{r} faces was [\frac{\partial A_r}{\partial r} + \frac{2 A_r}{r_0}] r_0^2 sin(\theta_0) dr d\theta d\phi ---> which is our \int (∇ \cdot \vec{A}) dv for these 2 faces

Now when you look at the r-component of the divergence in spherical coordinates online, you'll see this written as
(∇ \cdot \vec{A})_\hat{r} = \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial (r^2 A_r)}{\partial r}

In my notes, we did write it this way in the next step, but I guess I missed why you could re-write it that way. I'm thinking it should be easy (since it's just one step to get there)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try working it backward ie take the partial of r^2A sub r and what do you get?

The r^2sin(theta)drdthetadphi is the dv piece
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K