Divergence of second-order Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter paccali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Tensor
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
paccali
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the Divergence of a second-order tensor:

[tex]\sigma _{ij}(x_{i})=\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j}[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]\bigtriangledown \cdot \sigma_{ij}=\sigma_{ij'i}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\sigma_{ij'i}=\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{i}}\cdot\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j}[/tex]
[tex]=\sigma_{0}(x_{j})[/tex]

I'm not sure if this is correct. When I put it into a matrix form and calculate the divergence, I seem to get:

[tex]\sigma_{0}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{1}^{2} & x_{1}x_{2} & x_{1}x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1}x_{2} & x_{2}^{2} & x_{2}x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1}x_{3} & x_{2}x_{3} & x_{3}^{2}<br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\sigma_{ij'i}=\sigma_{0}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1} & 2x_{2} & x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1} & x_{2} & 2x_{3}<br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Which doesn't equal the partial that wasn't put into matrix form. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the other part of the problem, and please help me out with this:
[tex]\sigma(r)=\sigma_{0}\mathbf{r}\otimes\mathbf{r}[/tex] where [tex]\mathbr{r}=x_{i}i_{i}[/tex]

So, would this be a correct approach?:

[tex]\bigtriangledown \cdot\sigma_{ij}=\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{k}}\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j}i_{i}\otimes i_{j}\cdot i_{k}[/tex]
[tex]=(\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j})_{'k}i_{i}\delta _{jk}=\sigma_{0}(x_{i}x_{j})_{'j}i_{i}=\sigma_{0}x_{i}i_{i}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
tiny-tim said:
sorry, not my field … you'd better start a new thread on this one

Yeah, sorry, the problem is in tensor notation, which implies summation symbols, but it's a shorthand.