Divergence of second-order Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter paccali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Tensor
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 6K views
paccali
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the Divergence of a second-order tensor:

[tex]\sigma _{ij}(x_{i})=\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j}[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]\bigtriangledown \cdot \sigma_{ij}=\sigma_{ij'i}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\sigma_{ij'i}=\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{i}}\cdot\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j}[/tex]
[tex]=\sigma_{0}(x_{j})[/tex]

I'm not sure if this is correct. When I put it into a matrix form and calculate the divergence, I seem to get:

[tex]\sigma_{0}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{1}^{2} & x_{1}x_{2} & x_{1}x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1}x_{2} & x_{2}^{2} & x_{2}x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1}x_{3} & x_{2}x_{3} & x_{3}^{2}<br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\sigma_{ij'i}=\sigma_{0}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1} & 2x_{2} & x_{3}\\ <br /> x_{1} & x_{2} & 2x_{3}<br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Which doesn't equal the partial that wasn't put into matrix form. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi paccali! :wink:

σij'i is a vector, not a tensor …

you haven't summed over i :smile:
 
Here is the other part of the problem, and please help me out with this:
[tex]\sigma(r)=\sigma_{0}\mathbf{r}\otimes\mathbf{r}[/tex] where [tex]\mathbr{r}=x_{i}i_{i}[/tex]

So, would this be a correct approach?:

[tex]\bigtriangledown \cdot\sigma_{ij}=\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{k}}\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j}i_{i}\otimes i_{j}\cdot i_{k}[/tex]
[tex]=(\sigma_{0}x_{i}x_{j})_{'k}i_{i}\delta _{jk}=\sigma_{0}(x_{i}x_{j})_{'j}i_{i}=\sigma_{0}x_{i}i_{i}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
sorry, not my field … you'd better start a new thread on this one
 
tiny-tim said:
sorry, not my field … you'd better start a new thread on this one

Yeah, sorry, the problem is in tensor notation, which implies summation symbols, but it's a shorthand.