Can Differentials Be Divided Out in Equations Involving Well-Behaved Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentials
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether differentials can be divided out in equations involving well-behaved functions. It is established that while one can informally treat the derivatives as fractions, dividing out differentials is not a rigorous approach. Instead, it is suggested to consider the functions as dependent on a single variable, allowing for a direct comparison of their derivatives. Integrating the equality of derivatives leads to the conclusion that f(x) equals g(x) plus a constant. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the formal definitions of derivatives and differentials in calculus.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

Say I have the equality
<br /> \frac{df(x)}{dx} = \frac{dg(z)}{dz}<br />
where f and g are two functions that are well-behaved such that I can take their derivate. The variables x and z are both real, and run from -∞ to ∞. In this case, am I allowed to divide out the differentials dx and dz such that
<br /> df(x) = dg(z)<br />
which I can integrate and obtain
<br /> f(x) = g(z) + \text{constant}<br />
?Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:

Homework Statement


Hi

Say I have the equality
<br /> \frac{df(x)}{dx} = \frac{dg(z)}{dz}<br />
where f and g are two functions that are well-behaved such that I can take their derivate. The variables x and z are both real, and run from -∞ to ∞. In this case, am I allowed to divide out the differentials dx and dz such that
<br /> df(x) = dg(z)<br />
which I can integrate and obtain
<br /> f(x) = g(z) + \text{constant}<br />
?Niles.

I'm assuming from here on that f and g are functions of one variable...

You can come to this conclusion without doing any formal calculations (eg. "dividing out by differentials"). Although what you have done would work.

z is just a variable, so you can just write g(x) instead of g(z). Then, you get
<br /> \frac{df(x)}{dx}=\frac{dg(x)}{dx}. Or, more sggestively, f&#039;(x)=g&#039;(x). Then, integrating both sides, you get f(x)=g(x)+constant.

Dividing out by differentials, which is a formal calculation (and thus not rigorous), is not necessary. Although, it is true that, in a sense, you can divide them out (see differential 1-forms).
 
Last edited:
Once we have the derivative, dy/dx, it is standard to define the "differential" by dy= (dy/dx)dx where we can think of the "dx" as purely "symbolic". While the derivative is NOT a fraction, it is the limit of a fraction, the "difference quotient". It is possible to prove any "fraction property" by going back before the limit, applying the property to the difference quotient, then taking the limit. To make use of the fact that the derivative can be treated like a fraction, we define "differentials" in that way- we can say
f&#039;(x)= \frac{dy}{dx}
where the f'(x) on the left is the derivative and the dy/dx on the right is the ratio of the differentials.
 
Thanks for the quick replies.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K