DMD optical Setup: Diffraction-limited resolution

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter_44332
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The diffraction-limited resolution for the optical setup discussed is calculated using the Rayleigh criterion, resulting in δ = 0.61*λ/(NA) ≈ 4.6 µm, where λ is 1500 nm and NA is 0.2. However, the resolution of the DMD projection is not solely determined by the diffraction limit but rather by the size of the field aperture located between lenses 2 and 3. The absence of an aperture stop for lens 2 can lead to variable resolution across the DMD field, and achieving a telecentric condition for lens 2 is recommended to optimize performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diffraction-limited resolution and Rayleigh criterion
  • Familiarity with optical components such as lenses and numerical aperture
  • Knowledge of DMD (Digital Micromirror Device) technology and its projection characteristics
  • Basic principles of optical setups, including 4f configurations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of telecentric optics and their application in optical setups
  • Learn about the design and function of field apertures in optical systems
  • Explore the impact of numerical aperture on resolution in microscopy
  • Investigate methods for optimizing DMD projection angles and illumination techniques
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, researchers in photonics, and professionals involved in DMD technology and optical system design will benefit from this discussion.

Peter_44332
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'd like to calculate the diffraction-limited resolution for the following optical setup:

1755455429074.webp

  • Source: multimode fiber end, NA = 0.2 --> smallest NA, likely limiting?
  • Wavelength: 1500 nm
  • Lens 1 & 2: f = 50 mm & d = 25 mm
  • Lens 3: f = 30 mm & d = 12.5 mm
Is it correct to assume that the diffraction-limited resolution (Rayleigh criterion) is δ = 0.61*λ/(NA) ≈ 4.6 µm?

Since my projected DMD pixel size is 8 µm, the setup would be sampling-limited rather than diffraction-limited, correct?


Thanks a lot for your help!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Not correct. Diffraction limitation of the illumination beam is not connected to the DMD pixel size and it resolution. The size of illumination beam is only defining the size of illuminated area at DMD.
The resolution of the DMD projection is defined by the size of field aperture located at focus between lens 2 and 3. You haven't showed any aperture between lens 2 and 3 on the drawing, but the size of aperture at the beam focus is defining how wide diffraction angle is accepted from the DMD.
 
Thanks for the reply! There is no field aperture positioned between lenses 2 and 3, the diffraction orders of the DMD are recombined with the 4f-setup.
 
DMD setup resolution.webp

May be this picture helps.
Think about Lens 2 as a microscope looking at DMD pixels. Its resolution would be defined by the numerical aperture of Lens 2 in the object space (at DMD object), meaning how width angle of diffracted from DMD object would be accepted by lens 2 and consecutive optics.
If you have not defined any aperture stop for lens 2, it resolution may vary over DMD field as numerical aperture may vary. The best option I would aim telecentric condition for lens 2, setting the aperture stop at it focus (approximately where you have beam focused between lenses 2 and 3).
Another problem is that projection of DMD is done at some angle, meaning your projected field would be also tilted in the image space. Why not make illumination at angle and projection optics working ortogonal to the DMD?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K