Do All Cells and Microorganisms Meet the Criteria of Life?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Not all cells and microorganisms meet the established criteria of life, which include homeostasis, organization, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, and reproduction. While most bacteria fulfill these criteria when active, entities like viruses and prions do not qualify as living organisms. The discussion highlights the complexity of defining life, particularly with exceptions such as mules, which cannot reproduce, yet their cells can. The debate surrounding these criteria reflects ongoing discussions in biology and philosophy regarding the nature of life.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the criteria of life in biology
  • Familiarity with microorganisms, including bacteria and viruses
  • Basic knowledge of cellular functions and reproduction
  • Awareness of philosophical implications in biological definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the criteria of life in detail, focusing on exceptions like mules and their cellular functions
  • Explore the characteristics of viruses and prions in relation to the definition of life
  • Investigate the field of artificial life and its implications for understanding living systems
  • Examine philosophical perspectives on what constitutes life and the implications for biological classification
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, students of life sciences, philosophers interested in the definition of life, and anyone exploring the boundaries of living organisms.

physarrista
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Do all cells and microorganisms fulfill the criteria of life?

Homeostasis
Organisation
Metabolism
Growth
Adaption
Response to Stimuli
Reproduction

I'm asking, because I know that there are animal species which don't fulfill all those criteria (I know a mule can't reproduce) and I was wondering if there are bacteria or cell lines out there which for example don't grow or something. It doesn't seem possible to me, but with biology you never know..
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Depends on what you consider a microorganism - viruses and prions do not meet most of those criteria, but the general of view of these beasties is that they are not really living.

If you include things that metabolize when they are in an active phase (not parked inside a spore for example), then I think the answer is yes. This would discard viruses, for example.
 
It's true an entire mule can't reproduce, but many of its cells surely can.
 
Yeah.
Some googling revealed, there seems to be some kind of debate out there about the criteria anyways.
I remember learning "movement" as an attribute of life in high school biology class. This seems to have been taken off the list, since.
 
Search around this site, Jim or some other frequent poster has already written prolifically about grey areas in biology and how to think about them.
 
It wouldn't be difficult to write a computer program that simulates agents having all these properties. Indeed lots of research along these lines is carried out in the field usually called "artificial life".

" Are those agents really "alive"? " Is probably more a philosophy of language question than anything else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K