Do All Cells and Microorganisms Meet the Criteria of Life?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether all cells and microorganisms meet the established criteria of life, which include homeostasis, organization, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, and reproduction. Participants explore the implications of these criteria in relation to various biological entities, including bacteria, viruses, and specific animal species.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether all cells and microorganisms fulfill the criteria of life, citing examples like mules that cannot reproduce.
  • Another participant argues that the classification of microorganisms is crucial, noting that viruses and prions do not meet most criteria and are generally not considered living.
  • A participant points out that while a mule cannot reproduce, its individual cells are capable of reproduction.
  • There is mention of a debate regarding the criteria of life, with a participant recalling that "movement" was once included as a criterion but seems to have been removed.
  • One participant suggests that simulating agents with life properties through computer programs raises philosophical questions about what it means to be "alive."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the criteria of life and whether certain entities, like viruses, should be classified as living. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding definitions of life and the criteria applied to various organisms, as well as the implications of classifying certain entities as living or non-living.

physarrista
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Do all cells and microorganisms fulfill the criteria of life?

Homeostasis
Organisation
Metabolism
Growth
Adaption
Response to Stimuli
Reproduction

I'm asking, because I know that there are animal species which don't fulfill all those criteria (I know a mule can't reproduce) and I was wondering if there are bacteria or cell lines out there which for example don't grow or something. It doesn't seem possible to me, but with biology you never know..
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Depends on what you consider a microorganism - viruses and prions do not meet most of those criteria, but the general of view of these beasties is that they are not really living.

If you include things that metabolize when they are in an active phase (not parked inside a spore for example), then I think the answer is yes. This would discard viruses, for example.
 
It's true an entire mule can't reproduce, but many of its cells surely can.
 
Yeah.
Some googling revealed, there seems to be some kind of debate out there about the criteria anyways.
I remember learning "movement" as an attribute of life in high school biology class. This seems to have been taken off the list, since.
 
Search around this site, Jim or some other frequent poster has already written prolifically about grey areas in biology and how to think about them.
 
It wouldn't be difficult to write a computer program that simulates agents having all these properties. Indeed lots of research along these lines is carried out in the field usually called "artificial life".

" Are those agents really "alive"? " Is probably more a philosophy of language question than anything else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K