Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Do ALL hadrons eventually decay into protons?

  1. Dec 29, 2012 #1
    I have two sources, one (school textbook) is telling me that ''all hadrons eventually decay into a proton'', whereas a few other people have told me that ''only bayrons decay into protons''. I want to know because I originally wanted to find out whether mesons decay into protons, and mesons obviously are part of the hadron family, but they're not bayrons.

    So I'm confused, which is true?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 29, 2012 #2

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Only baryons decay into protons. pi mesons are lighter than protons. That would be an impossible decay even if baryon number weren't conserved.
     
  4. Dec 29, 2012 #3
    I guess my textbook is wrong then, thats 3 people against the textbook now :p

    anyway, what you said about pi mesons being lighter than proton, is new to me. So this a rule then, that a particle can only decay into things which have a smaller mass than itself?

    by the way, you know 'rest energy' (in MeV units)? if I convert it to joules and then sub it into the e = mc^2 equation, that would give me the mass of the particles, right?
     
  5. Dec 29, 2012 #4

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes. If a particle could decay into a heavier one, where would the extra rest-energy come from? :smile:

    Yes, you get the mass in kg. However, if you ask most physicists (at least most particle physicists) "what's the mass of [some particle]", they'll give it to you in MeV or keV units anyway, for example 938.3 MeV/c2 for a proton. Those units are more convenient for many of the calculations that they do.
     
  6. Dec 29, 2012 #5

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Sure it's a rule. You can't decay into something heavier and still conserve energy. And yes, converting to joules and substituting will give you the mass in kg. It's good practice, but if you are going to do this a lot it's helpful to just remember some conversions. Like .5 MeV comes out pretty close to the electron mass and 940 MeV is close to the proton mass.
     
  7. Dec 29, 2012 #6
    all makes sense now, thanks guys!
     
  8. Dec 29, 2012 #7

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    To be precise: All free baryons decay to protons (or antiprotons).
    Neutrons in nuclei can be stable.

    All mesons eventually decay to photons, leptons and (rare) baryons, with only stable particles (proton, bound neutron, photon, electron, all 3 neutrino types and their antiparticles) in the final state.
     
  9. Dec 29, 2012 #8

    and how do neutrons become 'free'?

    I've read that if a nucleus gets too big (containing too many nucleons, or is protons more specifically? idk), then it'll become unstable, is this when neutrons become 'free'?

    also while we're onto this topic, what is the minimum number of neutrons that a nucleus must have? (I know that for hydrogen, it can contain no neutrons, but is this the same for other elements?)

    K-mesons decay into Pi mesons

    Pi mesons then decay into muons and their respective neutrino/anti-neutrino (leptons). Is this right?

    At least thats how I understand it, so where does photon come into all this?

    bearing in mind I'm in my last year of school (A-levels), so you don't have to go into too much detail if its too advance for what me
     
  10. Dec 29, 2012 #9

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Some nuclei can release neutrons on their own, usually together with fission or directly after fusion.
    Some nuclei are stable with neutrons - if you do not shoot other particles on them, they will stay like that forever (assuming no proton decay*).

    *if protons decay, all baryons and all nuclei will decay to other particles

    This is given by the proton drip line, which lists the first unbound isotopes per element.

    That is the most common decay mode. And muons decay into electron + anti-electronneutrino + muonneutrino.

    Neutral pions usually decay into two photons, and other decays can emit a photon as well. This does not mean that every decay chain involves photons, but they are possible, so I listed them.

    The http://pdglive.lbl.gov/listings1.brl?quickin=Y [Broken] has lists of decay modes and their relative probability (branching fraction).
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  11. Dec 29, 2012 #10
    once again, thanks for explaining
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  12. Dec 30, 2012 #11
    Hadrons have a property called the Baryon number which is conserved by all everyday reactions*.

    Protons, neutrons and other baryons have Baryon numbers of 1 (with -1 for the corresponding antiparticles).

    All mesons have Baryon number 0. Therefore, mesons can never decay into baryons unless a matching number of anti-baryons are also produced.

    So it's possible that the final decay state of a heavy meson could contain a proton, but it would then also have to include an anti-proton.

    Most commonly, though, the ultimate decay products of mesons are photons and/or leptons (electrons and neutrinos).

    * The above all stems from quark number conservation. The only exceptions would be in physics beyond the Standard Model, eg GUTs that contain interactions that can change individual quarks into leptons. None of the currently known interactions can do this, as the electric charge of the particle would also have to change by a fractional amount and there are no currently known force-carrier bosons that can 'carry away' fractional electric charges.
     
  13. Jan 3, 2013 #12
    This is actually not correct. The Standard Model, by itself, has non-perturbative gauge configurations called "sphalerons" which violate both the conservation of baryon and lepton numbers, but leave the difference between the two conserved. In other words, these processes can convert three quarks into an anti-lepton (or two quarks into an anti-quark and an anti-lepton, etc.)
     
  14. Jan 4, 2013 #13
    OK. But these sphaleron transitions don't seem to be observed in any experiments I'm aware of. Is this because they would require even higher energy levels than (say) LHC can muster, or is there a bit more to it than that. Unfortunately, this area is some way beyond my own current understanding.
     
  15. Jan 5, 2013 #14
    Yes. They're pretty much inaccessible at ordinary scales. But, they're pretty strongly implicated to have some involvement in the matter/antimatter asymmetry. To wit, the availability of sphaleron transitions allows the entire asymmetry to be generated in either the baryon or lepton sector, since the B+L violating transitions will carry it over into the other.
     
  16. Jan 5, 2013 #15

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Even better: Sphalerons conserve B-L, but violate B+L in a natural way.
    Our universe has large positive B and L values, but the difference can be small, or maybe even zero?
    You need an asymmetry in the whole system, but no additional asymmetry of baryons or leptons.
     
  17. Jan 6, 2013 #16
  18. Jan 6, 2013 #17

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's discussing decay of a meson to baryon-antibaryon pairs. There's no violation of net baryon number. Once the unstable baryons decay you'll be left with a proton-antiproton pair, which can then annihilate into a state with no baryons at all.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Do ALL hadrons eventually decay into protons?
  1. Protons decaying (Replies: 2)

  2. Proton Decay (Replies: 13)

  3. Proton decay (Replies: 5)

  4. How do protons decay? (Replies: 34)

Loading...