Do Animals Understand Themselves and Others?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gttjohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether animals possess the ability to understand themselves and others, particularly in the context of deception and honesty. Participants examine various examples of animal behavior, including predation and social interactions, to assess if these behaviors can be classified as lying or dishonesty.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if animals can lie or be dishonest, suggesting that such concepts may be reserved for human behavior.
  • Others propose that certain animal behaviors, such as playing dead or hiding food, could be seen as forms of deception, though the classification of these actions as lies is debated.
  • A participant shares an anecdote about their dog stealing food and questions whether this behavior reflects dishonesty or survival instinct.
  • Some argue that for an animal to lie, it would need to have a consciousness that allows for the understanding of untruths, while others suggest that animals may engage in manipulative behaviors without this level of awareness.
  • There are references to studies and examples of deceptive behaviors in animals like chimpanzees and scrub jays, raising questions about the cognitive processes behind such actions.
  • Participants discuss the distinction between consciousness and conscience, with some asserting that animals lack the reflective ability to discern right from wrong in the way humans do.
  • There is a suggestion that animals may act based on learned behaviors aimed at achieving their goals rather than a conscious intent to deceive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding whether animals can lie or be dishonest. There is no consensus on the definitions of deception, consciousness, or the implications of animal behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the cognitive abilities of animals, the definitions of lying and deception, and the implications of animal behavior on understanding consciousness and conscience.

  • #31
Radrook said:
In reference too self-awaerness, I once read in "Science Magazine" that monkeys always confuse their own reflection in the mirror with another monkey. They growl at their own image, try to attack it, and display all kinds of self-defensive behavior at what they consider another monkey. In contrast, the chimp will realize that it's himself it is observing and begins opening its mouth to examine its own teeth and otherwise showing self recognition.
Is it self-recognition or just making a cognitive connection between the image in the mirror and corresponding objects that are being reflected? The chimp may not actually identify with its image or even its own body. It may have a total object-orientation and no sense of personal "self" is involved.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
thephysicsman said:
I don't think honesty can be applied to animals, since honesty requires free will.

I don't believe in free will. I'm also pretty sure that humans are animals :)

This is a mostly philosophical question. Does honesty require consciousness? What is consciousness? Does honesty require a sense of morality? What is morality? Etc...

I would say no, animals are not always honest. Things like camouflage and sneaking are a form of deceit. I don't think deceit even requires consciousness. I think at least some animals could be considered conscious though. Humans certainly are. Other animals that seem to think similarly to us seem to be conscious too. Chimps and dogs for example. Some other animals seem to think so differently than us that it's hard to relate our ideals to the way they think.
 
  • #33
brainstorm said:
Is it self-recognition or just making a cognitive connection between the image in the mirror and corresponding objects that are being reflected? The chimp may not actually identify with its image or even its own body. It may have a total object-orientation and no sense of personal "self" is involved.

Since we began this thread, I've been paying closer attention to the behavior of my pets. The puppies watch quite a bit of television - everything from cable news to cartoons to animal planet. They respond to all animal shapes - even the cartoons. However, they are most demonstative in their behavior when they see other dogs.

They've also learned to identify the theme music to several commercials. The male wakes up from a sound sleep everytime he hears the Traveler's insurance spot featuring a dog that sings "trouble". Every time he hears the music, he runs for a toy or a mouthful of his dry food. The female stands on her hind feet and cries every time she hears the "ComfyControl Harness" spot.

As for the mirror - they don't bark at their own images any longer - perhaps no longer a threat?

As for their honesty, they engage in very specific behavior when their food bowl is empty, when they need water, and when they need to go outside. Failure to respond to the outside signal will net an honest production of proof.:rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K