Do Carmo's book, chap2 Regular surfaces, definition 1.2 -- question

Jianphys17
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
On chapter over regular surfaces, In definition 1 point 2. He says that x: U → V∩S is a homeomorphisms, but U⊂ℝ^2 onto V∩S⊂ℝ^3. I am confused, how can it be so!
 
on Phys.org
What's wrong with that?
 
micromass said:
What's wrong with that?
The fact that U ⊆ℝ^2 but V∩S⊆ℝ^3. How can there be a homomorphism between these two spaces, the dimensions are different ! :confused:
 
Jianphys17 said:
The fact that U ⊆ℝ^2 but V∩S⊆ℝ^3. How can there be a homomorphism between these two spaces, the dimensions are different ! :confused:

##\mathbb{R}^3## has dimension 3, but ##V\cap S## has dimension 2##.
 
micromass said:
##\mathbb{R}^3## has dimension 3, but ##V\cap S## has dimension 2##.
Sorry, but U⊂ℝ^2 and p∈S⊂ℝ^3, with neighborhood V⊂ℝ^3. But for homeomorphism definition, |U| ≠ |V∩S| as can be ?
 
##U## and ##V\cap S## have the same number of elements and the same dimension.
 
micromass said:
##U## and ##V\cap S## have the same number of elements and the same dimension.
I had realized that dim(V∩S) = 3.
Anyway thanks for the help.
 
Jianphys17 said:
I had realized that dim(V∩S) = 3.
Anyway thanks for the help.

It doesn't have dimension 3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jianphys17

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K