LSMOG
- 62
- 0
If we say electron behaves as wave, does this mean if we were able to see an electron, we would see it moving up and down?
The discussion revolves around the wave-particle duality of electrons, specifically whether electrons behave like waves and what that implies for their movement and probability distributions. Participants explore concepts related to quantum mechanics, including wavefunctions, probability waves, and interference patterns, with references to experimental observations such as the double slit experiment.
Participants express differing views on the implications of wave behavior for electrons, particularly regarding the nature of probability distributions and the effects of observation. There is no consensus on the interpretation of these wave-like properties.
Some claims depend on specific interpretations of quantum mechanics, and the discussion includes unresolved aspects regarding the nature of wavefunctions and the conditions under which probabilities change.
Jilang said:No, the likelihood of finding it at a certain place will go up and down.
Agreed. More akin to a standing wave, which waves in space but not in time. A confined particle has that nature.Drakkith said:Not true. Unless the properties of the system change, then the probability of finding the electron at any location remains the same as before. As an example, if I observe that an electron exists around an atom in a specific location, call it X, the probability of it being at position Y remains the same as before unless I modified the system (the atom and electron in this case) by observing it, perhaps by exciting the electron to another energy level.
It implies wave-like properties of the probability amplitude distribution of position (or momentum). In a guide wave theory the electron is a point, not a wave.anorlunda said:Electrons make Interference patterns like photons do in the double slit experiment. That implies some wave like properties.