Do floating objects clump together on curves in rivers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zuz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Floating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of floating objects clumping together on curves in rivers, exploring various principles and effects that might explain this behavior. Participants consider both theoretical and practical implications, touching on fluid dynamics and related concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a principle suggesting that objects tend to clump together on curves, seeking confirmation or correction from others.
  • Another participant proposes that in river curves, the outside has higher water velocity which erodes debris, while the inside has slower velocity where sediment is deposited, potentially contradicting the initial claim of clumping.
  • A reference to meandering rivers is provided, indicating that sediment deposition occurs on the inside of curves, while erosion happens on the outside.
  • One participant suggests that if objects cannot pass each other, they will bunch up, particularly in scenarios like car traffic on curves, where slower drivers can obstruct faster ones.
  • Discussion includes various physical effects such as the Casimir effect, Coanda effect, and Bernoulli effect, with suggestions that these might explain the attraction between floating objects or vehicles in certain conditions.
  • A participant mentions density waves as a related concept that was previously encountered, indicating a broader exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether floating objects clump together on curves, with some supporting the idea while others provide counterarguments based on fluid dynamics principles. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various physical effects and principles without reaching a consensus on their applicability to the phenomenon in question. The discussion includes assumptions about object behavior in fluid dynamics that may not be fully explored or defined.

zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
I recall reading somewhere about when anything, (eg. cars on the road, balls in a flowing stream) tend to clump together on curves. I don't remember where I read it but I seem to think there was some principal involved. Has anyone ever heard of this before, or am I mistaken. Thanks.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I'll take an amateur stab at this (I probably shouldn't, but I have no willpower):
A river often digs into the bank at a curve and leaves a stagnation point where the water just swirls around. Anything washed into it will tend to stay there and get tangled up with other things. And the decreased water velocity let's stuff settle there.

EDIT: The following posts seem to indicate that I got it wrong. On a curve, the outside of the curve has higher velocity water which caries away dirt and debris and the inside of the curve has slower velocity water where dirt and debris are deposited.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, 256bits and davenn
You can read up on it yourself for meandering rivers.
An example hit
http://www.seddepseq.co.uk/DEPOSITIONAL_ENV/Fluvial/Meander/meander.htm
meandering rivers typically only contain one channel that winds its way across the floodplain. As it flows, it deposits sediment on banks that lie on the insides of curves (point bar deposits), and erode the banks on the outside of curves
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and FactChecker
zuz said:
I recall reading somewhere about when anything, (eg. cars on the road, balls in a flowing stream) tend to clump together on curves. I don't remember where I read it but I seem to think there was some principal involved. Has anyone ever heard of this before, or am I mistaken. Thanks.
@FactChecker and 256bits have given details and I am not educated in this so @daven could give insight on this.
This is cool and gives examples across the world.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
It is clear that if objects cannot pass, then they will tend to bunch up with fast ones at the rear and slow ones in the lead. Car drivers reaching a curve slow down, overcautious drivers slow down more, so tend to obstruct the others, which results in natural bunching.
If cars enter a road section two seconds apart, and remain 2 seconds apart, then they will be closer where the speed is lower, such as at corners. Because cars do not have zero length, the linear separation is reduced quickly and could cause a pileup when it takes a vehicle more than two seconds to travel it's own length.

Where flowing water forms an eddy, that is drained by a central downward movement, any floating objects that enter the eddy will collect there, unless they sink in the whirlpool.

A hydrophobic floating object, such as a waxed wooden block floating on water, will form a local depression in the surface. Two such objects will move together as they slide down the slope of the water surface. Indeed, one hydrophobic object will attract any other floating object.

Ships close together, becalmed at sea are drawn to each other because one will shelter the other from light variable winds. Maybe that is an analogue of the Casimir effect.
If there is a swell then some wave energy will be reflected from the boats. That should also push them together. I believe the presence of the oscillatory swell makes that the Casimir effect.
Where wind blows through the gap between two close vessels, the wind speed is slightly greater than outside the vessels. Faster flow implies lower pressure between the vessels, so they should be attracted together. That is the Bernoulli effect. It requires the wind be sufficient to flow around and between the boats, while not strong enough for the boats to sail apart.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: diogenesNY
Actually I mentioned this on another site and someone mentioned density waves and I think that is what I had heard earlier. Thanks everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
17K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K