Ja4Coltrane
- 224
- 0
3trQN said:What about thinking geometrically, i often find myself understanding a concept and abstract concepts relations to each other geometrically (as pictures and geometrical objects in my mind, intersections, tangents etc) yet not being able to fully express those algebraically or in a symbolic form very easily (or rapidly).
I can say to myself "I understand this, and i know it is related to this other concept because of the way these pieces fit together", yet i can't show that very easily.
This comes from early development of conceptualising things without mathematical equations (through a late development of mathematical skill), symbolic, and developing a picture/model approach (which basically achieves largely the same thing in terms of understanding and abstract relation).
The problem is then one of communication, learning the language to express these concepts unambiguously, not one of understanding. If you see my dilemma.
I don't think that is a bad thing though--those intuitive abillities that you gain from just living are so important for physics. I also think that a development of mathematical ability can happen more easily if you can already see these things in your mind. After all, math is nothing but a flawless way of showing logic.