Do Isolation Transformers Compromise the Earth Wiring Protection of a Circuit?

Click For Summary
Isolation transformers are designed to protect against electric shock by isolating the circuit from the Earth, preventing a closed circuit that could lead to injury. However, this isolation can compromise the Earth wiring protection, which is crucial for safety during faults and lightning strikes. While the transformer can reduce the risk of shock in a balanced system, it does not provide the same level of safety as a grounded system, especially if multiple points in the isolated system are touched. Lightning protection can be a concern, as isolation transformers may be vulnerable to static discharges. Ultimately, while isolation transformers enhance safety in certain scenarios, they do not replace the need for effective Earth wiring protection.
physior
Messages
182
Reaction score
1
hello!

isolation transformers are supposedly protecting from electric shock

without them, the voltage source is connected to a circuit and the circuit is connected to Earth via an earthing wire.

if you touch the live circuit, a closed circuit will be formed that will give you electric shock: the current will flow from the live circuit through you to the Earth and from the Earth to the earthing cable

so the purpose of isolation transformer is to actually isolate this earthing cable, so that there will be no path for the current to return to the live circuit and thus form a closed circuit

am I right?

my question is:
after installing an isolating transformer, don't we lose the Earth wiring protection of the circuit? which serves the thunder protection?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have the right idea. When you isolate the supply and connect (via your body, perhaps) any part of the equipment to Earth, then that part of the equipment acquired Earth potential with only a very small flow of current and you do not die or even feel anything. The two supply wire potentials will 'pivot' around this point and have the same PD between them as ever. This is perfect protection for a single fault in an otherwise perfect system. However, if someone else touches a different point in the isolated system then current can flow through both of you and kill you. It need not be another person - just any path to earth. The system is no longer floating and gives you no protection at all. If there is a third, Earth cable then, of course, any exposed metal will be held at 0V and you would be protected as normal. The two safety devices are not really equivalent (and are not mutually exclusive), though and an Earth cable is much more 'fail safe' and passive than a system that you assume to be balanced. An Earth network will help give lightning protection in any case.
 
physior said:
hello!

isolation transformers are supposedly protecting from electric shock

without them, the voltage source is connected to a circuit and the circuit is connected to Earth via an earthing wire.

if you touch the live circuit, a closed circuit will be formed that will give you electric shock: the current will flow from the live circuit through you to the Earth and from the Earth to the earthing cable

so the purpose of isolation transformer is to actually isolate this earthing cable, so that there will be no path for the current to return to the live circuit and thus form a closed circuit

am I right?

my question is:
after installing an isolating transformer, don't we lose the Earth wiring protection of the circuit? which serves the thunder protection?
There is an impossible problem regarding lightning protection when using isolation transformers because the two requirements are in conflict. For instance, when a transformer is supplying lights on a high mast. There is a danger that a moderate static discharge, perhaps one induced on the power line, can flash across the transformer and destroy it.
 
physior said:
my question is:
after installing an isolating transformer, don't we lose the Earth wiring protection of the circuit? which serves the thunder protection?
Yes, but in the most of situations, good lightning protection of primary circuit is sufficient.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
37K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K