High School Do Objects in Free Fall Encounter Air Resistance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the definition of free fall, emphasizing that free-falling objects are influenced solely by gravity and do not encounter air resistance. Participants agree that in an atmosphere, objects experience drag force, which prevents them from being in true free fall. The conversation highlights the distinction between physics definitions and colloquial interpretations, particularly in contexts like skydiving. It concludes that while free fall is a strict term, practical applications often overlook air resistance for simplicity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and free fall concepts
  • Familiarity with air resistance and drag force principles
  • Basic knowledge of terminal velocity
  • Awareness of physics terminology and definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of terminal velocity in different mediums
  • Explore the physics of free fall in a vacuum versus in an atmosphere
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on falling objects
  • Investigate the physics of skydiving and its terminology
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining motion concepts, skydivers, and anyone interested in the principles of gravity and air resistance.

davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
9,714
Reaction score
11,666
from ...

www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1DKin/Lesson-5/The-Big-Misconception

"Free-fall is the motion of objects that move under the sole influence of gravity; free-falling objects do not encounter air resistance.

Huh ?? of course it encounters air resistance, doesnt it ?
An object, regardless of what it is, encounters resistance, it's what keeps the freefall speed constant for that object

os is truer freefall definition , falling in a vacuum ? everything else has a terminal velocity ?

Dave

PS> I think I tripped myself up haha
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Physics news on Phys.org
davenn said:
is truer freefall definition , falling in a vacuum ?
Yes
 
davenn said:
Huh ?? of course it encounters air resistance, doesnt it ?
Not on the Moon. The quoted exerpt says nothing about "near the surface of the Earth".
 
A.T. said:
Yes

thanks, Initially when i read that statement online, I was forgetting the about terminal velocity,
and that was what was leading me astray

Old age and and senility is my excuse haha

Dave

and to show how bad that is .... I typed this response 2 hrs ago and just found that I
hadnt sent it haha
Long before Kuruman responded LOL
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Free-fall is defined as moving only under the influence of gravity, so strictly speaking nothing falling in atmosphere is in free fall because it always experiences drag force. So I think "free-falling objects do not encounter air resistance" (as quoted in the OP) is stated the wrong way round - it would be better to say "if it encounters air resistance, it's not in free-fall".

The usual "eh, close enough" rules apply to stuff like dropping a rock a short distance from rest, and we use free-fall calculations for that kind of thing because the error is negligible.
 
It's a physics definition vs a colloquial/laymen's definition. Skydivers refer to what they are doing as "freefall".
 
russ_watters said:
Skydivers refer to what they are doing as "freefall".
And the videos they take of each other show that opening a parachute will send you upwards. Just what sort of a world are they living in?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
sophiecentaur said:
And the videos they take of each other show that opening a parachute will send you upwards. Just what sort of a world are they living in?
Relative?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
russ_watters said:
Skydivers refer to what they are doing as "freefall".
And so did Tom Petty.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur and gmax137
  • #10
davenn said:
freefall definition , falling in a vacuum ?
Yes. Note that ##g## is properly called the free fall acceleration.
 
  • #11
Mister T said:
Yes. Note that ##g## is properly called the free fall acceleration.
A huge change of scale and we think of motion in deep space as being 'free fall' but the g forces are minuscule and I'd imagine that the 'drag' due to momentum exchange in very low density gas and dust must often be of the same order of magnitude - which explains why nebulae evolve to form planetary discs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K