High School Testing the effect of Gravity at home....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of gravity and air resistance on falling objects, specifically comparing a ping pong ball and a lead ball of identical dimensions. It is established that while both objects fall under the influence of gravity, the lead ball will reach the ground first due to its greater mass and lower impact from air resistance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of release height and terminal velocity, concluding that in a typical home setting, the ping pong ball will lag behind the lead ball unless air resistance is eliminated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion, particularly Newton's second law (F=ma).
  • Familiarity with the concept of terminal velocity and its dependence on mass and drag.
  • Basic knowledge of air resistance and its effects on falling objects.
  • Ability to apply differential equations to physical scenarios, specifically in motion analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of terminal velocity in detail, focusing on its mathematical derivation.
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on different shapes and sizes of objects.
  • Investigate the principles of Galileo's experiments on gravity and their historical significance.
  • Study the application of differential equations in modeling motion under various forces.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of gravity and motion, particularly in practical, experimental contexts.

  • #31
Music in a group requires coordinating movements between different people with probably microseconds precision. Watch videos of a drumline to see such precision visually.

The real problems with dropping two objects, especially of different weights, are that it isn't a decisive movement, isn't the same movement for each hand and small variations in hand position and friction can significantly affect the outcome. This can be fixed by using a decisive release mechanism instead of dropping manually.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jbriggs444 said:
do not think that "reaction time" is the correct figure of merit here.
I've just been dropping a pair of marbles on to blutack, so they thump but don't bounce. I dropped one from 10cm and the other from 15, 20, and 30cm. I reckon that there was a single sound for the 10cm vs 15cm drop, a just about noticeable d-dump sound with the 20cm vs 10cm trial, and a clear double sound with the 30cm vs 10cm trial. I wasn't blinded or anything, so treat with caution, but that suggests that a 30ms difference isn't detectable, 60ms is just about, and 100ms is clear.

Considering that the guy in the video is dropping from waist height (~1m) I get a drop time of 450ms, suggesting that around 10-15% difference in drop times would be audible.

There's a lot to criticize about that experiment. I was just letting go of the marbles not using a mechanism, I didn't clean them after their impacts on the blutack, and I wasn't blinded to the release heights. But there are some rough numbers. Could probably do something more sophisticated if someone has a suggestion for an adjustable height simultaneous release mechanism...
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and jbriggs444
  • #33
An on-point experiment gets high marks in my book. Nicely low tech too.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and russ_watters
  • #34
gmax137 said:
1869?
That's the kind of little mistake that makes me question the whole thing...
And a bit of dyslexia might be excused but it was 1687 according to my researches...
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
14K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K