Do particles "care" about consciousness or simply the data

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the double slit experiment and the misconception that particles behave differently based on observation by conscious beings. It is established that all practical executions of the double slit experiment have utilized non-conscious measuring devices, such as electronic computers and photodetectors. The outcomes of these experiments are consistent and established prior to any conscious observation. This notion that particles "care" about being observed is dismissed as an urban legend, with no credible evidence supporting it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of measurement devices in quantum experiments
  • Awareness of common misconceptions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the double slit experiment variations and their implications
  • Read David Lindley's book "Where Did the Weirdness Go?" for further insights
  • Explore the role of measurement devices in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the historical context of misconceptions in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, science communicators, and anyone interested in debunking myths related to particle behavior and observation.

Jacob Gable
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm curious if there have been any variations to the double slit that specifically looked at whether the particles behavior was determined by the computer keeping the data or if a consious person was there to see it. For example what I had in mind was having an isolated room where the computer would choose to keep the data for maybe a few seconds before erasing it. Then compare the pattern when nobody is near the room to see the result before being erased to having a person in the room who can momentarily see it before being erased.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jacob Gable said:
I'm curious if there have been any variations to the double slit that specifically looked at whether the particles behavior was determined by the computer keeping the data or if a consious person was there to see it. For example what I had in mind was having an isolated room where the computer would choose to keep the data for maybe a few seconds before erasing it. Then compare the pattern when nobody is near the room to see the result before being erased to having a person in the room who can momentarily see it before being erased.
This has been done many times. Every practical execution of the double slit experiment has used non-conscious (electronic computers these days, but photographic film, photodetectors, and the like before we had modern electronics to help with our experimental designs) as measuring devices. In all cases, the experimental outcomes are solidly established before any conscious human looks at them.

Furthermore, no one is seriously suggesting that it might be otherwise. This entire idea that the particles care whether they're being observed or not is an urban legend, one that crept into the popular imagination a century ago before the modern formulation of quantum mechanics had been discovered.

You might want to give David Lindley's book "Where did the weirdness go?" a try, as an antidote to the urban legend. However, as this thread is based on a misunderstanding, we can close it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K