Do you feel proud to your contry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yu_wing_sin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around feelings of national pride and the reasons participants feel proud of their respective countries. It includes a variety of perspectives on cultural, historical, and political aspects of national identity, as well as critiques of nationalism.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses pride in China, citing its size, cultural history, technological advancements, and resources.
  • A participant from Norway mentions pride in not having invaded Tibet and the peaceful history regarding the Tibetan population.
  • An American participant questions the relevance of physical features of the land to national pride, while another lists various cultural and historical achievements they are proud of.
  • A Canadian participant expresses pride in their non-nuclear status and contributions like the metric system.
  • Several participants share humorous or light-hearted remarks about national pride and achievements, including references to Mount Rushmore and the contributions of different countries.
  • Some participants express skepticism or disdain towards nationalism, suggesting it is unnecessary or problematic.
  • A Malaysian participant shares pride in their country's diversity and low problems, while another echoes similar sentiments.
  • One participant critiques China's historical and ongoing political actions regarding other peoples, highlighting the complexities of national pride.
  • Another American participant expresses ambivalence about their national pride due to negative perceptions of the U.S. government.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on national pride, with some celebrating their countries' achievements while others critique nationalism and express discomfort with certain historical actions. There is no clear consensus on the value of nationalism or the reasons for pride.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal feelings and cultural perspectives, which may be influenced by individual experiences and historical contexts. The discussion includes a mix of positive and critical viewpoints regarding national identity.

  • #151
motai said:
Meditate.. right :rolleyes: :biggrin:

Seems more like experimentation to me :redface:.
WELL,
it is indeed :approve:
BUT... :confused: but... :confused: but... :confused:

gurkha-war-horse :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
russ_watters said:
Since I feel the American one is the best,
And why do you feel so, and why do you think you feel so?
I feel it would benefit other countries more to adopt our system (or, perhaps, a hybrid) than others.
How do you know there is no better systems? Do you think Sweden should adopt the American system?
It gave me great pride when I visited Lithuania about 5 years ago and saw how the citizens identified with American values on government.
I thought their government was more inspired by different Western European governments. What makes it more typically American?
I don't have a clue what the average North Korean thinks about his country/situation.
Since they are tought in school to follow their wonderful and great leader I'm pretty sure they are very patriotic.
I know that if I were in such a situation, I wouldn't have much of a national identity left to feel patriotism for: in a dictatorship, the dictator is the country. And I would despise Il as much as a North Korean as I do as an American.
Sure? I think that's quite naive to think you would.
 
  • #153
EL said:
And why do you feel so, and why do you think you feel so?
That really isn't relevant - what is relevant is that I do feel this way.
How do you know there is no better systems?
The next-best systems are the ones of European countries and they don't work as well in my opinion. Socialist countries, especially, have very high unemployment rates.
Do you think Sweden should adopt the American system?
Yes.
I thought their government was more inspired by different Western European governments. What makes it more typically American?
Its more the democratic ideals than the structure. Things like less government influence (less socialism).
Since they are tought in school to follow their wonderful and great leader I'm pretty sure they are very patriotic.
That doesn't follow unless you think North Koreans are sheep who believe in their leader despite the fact that they are starving.
Sure? I think that's quite naive to think you would.
I think its naive to think that a person will mindlessly follow a system under which 20% of the country has starved to death in the past 10 years. People aren't quite that stupid.
 
  • #154
russ_watters said:
Its more the democratic ideals than the structure. Things like less government influence (less socialism).
Yet again the stupid right wing untruth.
If you hadn't noticed, russ watters, we ELECT our government, we do NOT elect the leaders of corporations with at least the same influence on our private lives as government officials.
 
  • #155
Im Proud of being born in a democratic country...Im free to to whatever i want(positive things of course), no restrictions what so ever..
The Underlining fact is, everybody is and should be proud of their country, irrespective of their cultural backgrounds..
 
  • #156
russ_watters said:
That doesn't follow unless you think North Koreans are sheep who believe in their leader despite the fact that they are starving. I think its naive to think that a person will mindlessly follow a system under which 20% of the country has starved to death in the past 10 years. People aren't quite that stupid.

Beg to differ, would suggest that the right circumstances and methods can be very effective in conditioning and submissing people to various "ideals". Don't we see that all the time everywhere rather than people displaying intelligence?
 
  • #157
Thanks for your answer. It confirmed my fears.

russ_watters said:
That really isn't relevant - what is relevant is that I do feel this way.
What? Havn't you ever thought about why you feel the way you feel? How can that be irrelevant?

The next-best systems are the ones of European countries and they don't work as well in my opinion. Socialist countries, especially, have very high unemployment rates.
So are you saying that Western European countries are socialistic? (Ok, this may be an issue if definition again.)

Yes.
So tell me, what do you know about Swedish politics?

Its more the democratic ideals than the structure. Things like less government influence (less socialism).
So are you still saying that the Lithuanian system is (or at least the people want it to be) more like the American than the Western Europeans. Is that just a feeling you have, or do you have any proofs for it?
(I could here also have disussed why less influence by an ELECTED government should be more democratic, but I leave that for Arildno)

That doesn't follow unless you think North Koreans are sheep who believe in their leader despite the fact that they are starving. I think its naive to think that a person will mindlessly follow a system under which 20% of the country has starved to death in the past 10 years. People aren't quite that stupid.
This has nothing to do with stupidity, as PerennialII pointed out. It has to do under what circumstances you are raised and live under. I'm pretty sure that if you (or I) were born in North Korea, there would be a very large risk you (I) would love the leader and the country.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K