Does (1/n+1/ni) converge to zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gottfried
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence \( \frac{1}{n} + \frac{1}{n}i \) converges to zero with respect to the metric \( d(z,w) = |z| + |w| \). The proof technique involves showing that \( \frac{\sqrt{2}}{n} < \epsilon \) for all \( n \) greater than \( \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\epsilon} \). It is established that \( n \) can be chosen as any integer greater than \( \sqrt{\frac{2}{\epsilon}} \), without needing \( \sqrt{\frac{2}{\epsilon}} \) to be an integer itself. This approach confirms the convergence of the sequence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation
  • Familiarity with convergence concepts in metric spaces
  • Knowledge of the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of convergence in metric spaces
  • Learn about different types of convergence for sequences in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties of metrics and their implications on convergence
  • Investigate the role of natural numbers in sequences and limits
USEFUL FOR

Students studying real analysis, particularly those focusing on sequences and convergence in metric spaces, as well as educators teaching complex analysis concepts.

gottfried
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Does the sequence [itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]i converge to zero with respect to the metric d(z,w) = |z|+|w|.

The Attempt at a Solution


So I realize I want √([itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]2+[itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]2)=[itex]\frac{√2}{n}[/itex] to be less than ε. So for all n greater than [itex]\frac{√2}{ε}[/itex] the order [itex]\frac{√2}{n}[/itex]<ε will hold.

So using the definition for all ε>0 there exists and nε=[itex]\frac{√2}{ε}[/itex] such that m>n implies [itex]\frac{√2}{n}[/itex]<ε.

Is my technique correct? Is finding a function for n in terms of ε that always maintains the equality sufficient for a proof? If this is the case and ε is a real number how to we ensure that n is a natural number? Does n have to be natural number or can that condition just be put on m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gottfried said:

Homework Statement


Does the sequence [itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]i converge to zero with respect to the metric d(z,w) = |z|+|w|.

The Attempt at a Solution


So I realize I want √([itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]2+[itex]\frac{1}{n}[/itex]2)=[itex]\frac{√2}{n}[/itex] to be less than ε. So for all n greater than [itex]\frac{√2}{ε}[/itex] the order [itex]\frac{√2}{n}[/itex]<ε will hold.

So using the definition for all ε>0 there exists and nε=[itex]\frac{√2}{ε}[/itex] such that m>n implies [itex]\frac{√2}{n}[/itex]<ε.

Is my technique correct? Is finding a function for n in terms of ε that always maintains the equality sufficient for a proof? If this is the case and ε is a real number how to we ensure that n is a natural number? Does n have to be natural number or can that condition just be put on m.

Looks ok. You generally choose n by just saying that it's an integer greater than [itex]\sqrt{\frac{2}{ε}}[/itex]. No need to worry about whether [itex]\sqrt{\frac{2}{ε}}[/itex] itself is an integer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K