user079622
- 449
- 29
Does wing really fly in already downward moving air?
Video from 18:15 - 19:40
Video from 18:15 - 19:40
Does a wing fly in its own downwash?
- Thread starter user079622
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Airflow
15 replies · 5K views · last reply
Discussion
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 9,653
- 4,868
I am not an expert in aerodynamics, but here is my two cents:
The wing is disturbing the horizontal air flow so that the air ahead of it is going up and the air behind it is going down. So it is "in" (as in producing) both an updraft and a downdraft that it is in the middle of. Because it is producing these effects, this should not be considered the same as a wing in the downwash of another airplane. Confusing that would be like confusing cause and effect.
The wing is disturbing the horizontal air flow so that the air ahead of it is going up and the air behind it is going down. So it is "in" (as in producing) both an updraft and a downdraft that it is in the middle of. Because it is producing these effects, this should not be considered the same as a wing in the downwash of another airplane. Confusing that would be like confusing cause and effect.
- 3,482
- 1,293
I don't understand the question.
user079622
- 449
- 29
If wing fly in own downwash, that would mean air ahead of the wing already moving downward.boneh3ad said:
Author in my video tell that in 18:47
So I ask is this case in reality?
Last edited:
- 3,482
- 1,293
I mean, his crudely-drawn hand sketch is not precise, if that's what you are asking.
But any object moving through a fluid medium is going to cause that fluid to deform around it. If it's subsonic, that influence on the medium extends upstream of the object. So, sure, some of that induced flow over a finite wing is downward, reducing lift.
Why are you asking me, though? Do you have reason to doubt Dr. Lippisch an his long career designing and building aircraft that actually fly?
But any object moving through a fluid medium is going to cause that fluid to deform around it. If it's subsonic, that influence on the medium extends upstream of the object. So, sure, some of that induced flow over a finite wing is downward, reducing lift.
Why are you asking me, though? Do you have reason to doubt Dr. Lippisch an his long career designing and building aircraft that actually fly?
user079622
- 449
- 29
Because I see upward movement of air ahead of wing...not downward..boneh3ad said:
Mentor
- 23,906
- 11,368
That's an airfoil, not a wing. It's 2-dimensional. The downwash is a 3-D wing effect that doesn't occur in this 2-D case.user079622 said:
user079622
- 449
- 29
OK just reduce this upwash a little but and you get picture for wing.russ_watters said:
Or you want to say that air moves downward ahead of wing ?
Mentor
- 23,906
- 11,368
The flow isn't uniform across the span, so I'd say there's no general answer for the question. I suspect there is upwards flow in front of parts of the wing and downwards flow in front of other parts. But I don't think I've seen a 3D representation of the flow field.user079622 said:
user079622
- 449
- 29
By the way this CFD is made on wing , it show airfoil because show streamlines at one place at wing ..it show wing profile at that location
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 9,653
- 4,868
The net downward flow of the air is the cause of lift. But that is primarily aft of the wing. The wing is the cause of the downflow and does not have the same effect of a wing in a downflow from following another airplane. So not all downflows are the same.
user079622
- 449
- 29
This is upwash ahead of wing for different aspect ratios.FactChecker said:
russ_watters said:
This CFD is made on wing , it show airfoil because show streamlines at one place at wing ..it show wing profile at that location
Last edited:
Nik_2213
- 1,251
- 500
If 'downwash' concept was strictly true, wouldn't aircraft with winglets / tip vortex recovery devices be unable to fly ??
Given they fly better than without, there's an over-simplification some-where in OC's source...
Given they fly better than without, there's an over-simplification some-where in OC's source...
Mentor
- 23,212
- 7,703
What I got from the video is that an aircraft flying through the air is like a person jogging in sand. The air and the sand both deform when weight is applied and you have to perform extra work to account for this. For the aircraft, this may already be shown in the airflow diagrams provided, but I doubt that's something that can be 'eyeballed' from them.