Does AB=G Imply AB=BA in Group Theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the products of two subgroups A and B of a group G, specifically whether the condition AB=G implies that AB=BA. Participants explore the implications of subgroup properties and the operations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether AB=G necessarily leads to AB=BA, seeking clarification on the definitions and operations involved.
  • One participant suggests that it is possible for BA to equal the trivial subgroup {1} while AB equals G, prompting requests for examples.
  • Another participant attempts to construct a proof showing that if AB=G, then ba must also be in AB, suggesting that this leads to the conclusion AB=BA.
  • However, a later reply challenges the validity of the proof, pointing out a flaw in the reasoning related to the commutativity of A and B.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their steps and reasoning, indicating a lack of consensus on the implications of the subgroup properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether AB=G implies AB=BA. There are competing views and ongoing debate regarding the validity of the proposed proofs and examples.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of subgroup properties, such as the existence of inverses, but there are unresolved assumptions about the commutativity of the groups involved. The discussion reflects a complex interplay of mathematical reasoning without definitive conclusions.

math8
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
If A and B are subgroups of G and AB=G does it follow that AB=BA? If yes, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see why you can't have BA={1}.
 
tgt, can you give an example in which AB= G and BA= {1}?
 
math8 said:
If A and B are subgroups of G and AB=G does it follow that AB=BA? If yes, why?

What does AB mean, i mean what operation are you performing between A and B here? is this supposed to be the same operation of the group G, or?
 
sutupidmath said:
What does AB mean, i mean what operation are you performing between A and B here? is this supposed to be the same operation of the group G, or?
AB is the set of elements of the form ab (with a in A & b in B).
 
HallsofIvy said:
tgt, can you give an example in which AB= G and BA= {1}?

it doesn't mean I can see it.
 
ok, so what about this.


Like said AB is the set of all elements such a is in A and b is in B. Then from this follows that also [tex]a^{-1}b^{-1}\in AB, since, a^{-1}\in A, b^{-1}\in B[/tex] this comes from the fact that both A,B are subgroups , so they do have inverses.

NOw since AB=G, it means also that the inverse of [tex]a^{-1}b^{-1}[/tex] is in AB. that is :

[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1})^{-1}=ba \in AB[/tex] So, from here we have:

[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1}) (a^{-1}b^{-1})^{-1}=e[/tex] or

[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1}) ba=e[/tex] Now multiplying with a from the left side we get

[tex]a(a^{-1}b^{-1}) ba=ae=>b^{-1}(ba)=a[/tex] now multiplying with b we get


[tex]ba=ab[/tex] since ab, was chosen randomly from AB it means that AB=BA, doesn't it?

I am not sure that this is absolutely right, someone else like halls or morphism, might comment on this!
 
sutupidmath said:
ok, so what about this.


Like said AB is the set of all elements such a is in A and b is in B. Then from this follows that also [tex]a^{-1}b^{-1}\in AB, since, a^{-1}\in A, b^{-1}\in B[/tex] this comes from the fact that both A,B are subgroups , so they do have inverses.

NOw since AB=G, it means also that the inverse of [tex]a^{-1}b^{-1}[/tex] is in AB. that is :

[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1})^{-1}=ba \in AB[/tex]
Your proof should have stopped here - this is all you need to show. AB=BA is an equality of sets.

As for the rest of your post:
[tex]b^{-1}(ba)=a[/tex] now multiplying with b we get

[tex]ba=ab[/tex]
This step is wrong. Can you see why?
 
morphism said:
This step is wrong. Can you see why?
Hell YES! This happens when you assume that the same thing is going to happen in next step as well. We cannot do this, because we don't know whether A, B are commutative. so by doing what i did in the last step, i should have multiplied by b from the left side, which would get us nowhere, since we would end up with ba=ba... and this is not what we wanted.


Well, i first also thought that i should stop here
[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1})^{-1}=ba \in AB[/tex]

but, like i said, wasn't sure enought, so i kept goin, but if i would have noticed earlier that my last step was nothing productive, then i probbably would have realized that this
[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1})^{-1}=ba \in AB[/tex] is all we need.. which also makes sens, sice this shows that for every element ab in AB, where a is in a,and b is in be, also ba is in AB, which means that b is in A, and b is in B. now sice, like said, ab were randomly chosen, that is for any ab, from AB it means that AB=BA.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K