math8
- 143
- 0
If A and B are subgroups of G and AB=G does it follow that AB=BA? If yes, why?
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the products of two subgroups A and B of a group G, specifically whether the condition AB=G implies that AB=BA. Participants explore the implications of subgroup properties and the operations involved.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether AB=G implies AB=BA. There are competing views and ongoing debate regarding the validity of the proposed proofs and examples.
Participants highlight the importance of subgroup properties, such as the existence of inverses, but there are unresolved assumptions about the commutativity of the groups involved. The discussion reflects a complex interplay of mathematical reasoning without definitive conclusions.
math8 said:If A and B are subgroups of G and AB=G does it follow that AB=BA? If yes, why?
AB is the set of elements of the form ab (with a in A & b in B).sutupidmath said:What does AB mean, i mean what operation are you performing between A and B here? is this supposed to be the same operation of the group G, or?
HallsofIvy said:tgt, can you give an example in which AB= G and BA= {1}?
Your proof should have stopped here - this is all you need to show. AB=BA is an equality of sets.sutupidmath said:ok, so what about this.
Like said AB is the set of all elements such a is in A and b is in B. Then from this follows that also [tex]a^{-1}b^{-1}\in AB, since, a^{-1}\in A, b^{-1}\in B[/tex] this comes from the fact that both A,B are subgroups , so they do have inverses.
NOw since AB=G, it means also that the inverse of [tex]a^{-1}b^{-1}[/tex] is in AB. that is :
[tex](a^{-1}b^{-1})^{-1}=ba \in AB[/tex]
This step is wrong. Can you see why?[tex]b^{-1}(ba)=a[/tex] now multiplying with b we get
[tex]ba=ab[/tex]
Hell YES! This happens when you assume that the same thing is going to happen in next step as well. We cannot do this, because we don't know whether A, B are commutative. so by doing what i did in the last step, i should have multiplied by b from the left side, which would get us nowhere, since we would end up with ba=ba... and this is not what we wanted.morphism said:This step is wrong. Can you see why?