Does an electron emit radiation when falling towards Earth?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CKH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In classical theory, an electron emits radiation when accelerated. However, in General Relativity (GR), a free electron falling towards Earth does not experience acceleration in an inertial frame, thus it does not emit radiation. Conversely, an electron held stationary in an electric field relative to Earth is accelerating and will emit radiation. This distinction highlights the complexities of electromagnetism within the framework of relativity, particularly in the context of Quantum Field Theory (QFT).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with classical electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Basic principles of inertial and non-inertial frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of General Relativity on electromagnetic radiation
  • Explore Quantum Field Theory and its application to particle physics
  • Study the concept of inertial versus non-inertial frames in detail
  • Investigate historical interpretations of GR, particularly Einstein's 1916 perspective
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of electromagnetism and General Relativity.

CKH
Messages
194
Reaction score
7
At least in classical theory, when an electron is accelerated it radiates energy. In GR, a free electron that is falling toward Earth is not accelerating (it's motion is inertial), so one would expect that if you dropped an electron in a vacuum tower, no radiation would be emitted. Conversely if you suspend the electron (in an electric field) so it is stationary wrt the earth, in GR the electron is accelerating so you would expect it to emit radiation.

What actually happens and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you know what actually happens - you've seen it.
"Why" is neither here nor there ... that's just the way it is.

If you mean "where is my description of the problem flawed?" then take another look at how electromagnetism works in relativity.

IRL, a relativistic description of electrons uses QFT.
 
DaleSpam said:
This is an interesting question. I would start here

http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath528/kmath528.htm

Wow, that is an interesting can of worms. There is no date on that paper. Do you suppose that an understanding has been reached since then?

If not, then there is more to understand about physics. It seems the electron itself is not fully grokked.

BTW, the issue of relativity of acceleration is broached in that text. Has that been discussed in the forum? I ask because questions by another poster have been raised about whether Einstein's own 1916 interpretation of GR has somehow changed since then in a more modern interpretation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K