tomlib said:
I'm sorry I don't have enough experience to counter but it seems to me from a layman's point of view that if a gas has a different density it can't have the same number of molecules and the distance between them can't always be the same. Apparently this is being tried with some reactions and a lot of products, but it would be very strange to me.
Unless, at the same pressure, the pressure in the mass would be different.
Possibly you are failing to account for temperature.
Certainly you can imagine Nitrogen gas (molecular weight 28) being twice as dense at Hydrogen gas (molecular weight 2) if the intermolecular separation is the same. You would be right to think that if the molecules in both gasses were moving equally rapidly on average that the Nitrogen gas would have 14 times the pressure.
But if the two gasses are at the same temperature, the nitrogen molecules will be moving more slowly on average.
The temperature of an ideal gas corresponds to the average kinetic energy of its component molecules. Not to their average velocity. If you multiply the mass of the molecules by a factor of 14, you divide their velocity by a factor of ##\sqrt{14}##. [At fixed temperature].
If you work out the pressure for particles with momentum multiplied by ##\frac{14}{\sqrt{14}}## striking the walls with frequency reduced by ##\sqrt{14}## you get that the pressure for a given temperature is unchanged. More massive molecules does not equate to higher pressure.
I do not know enough thermodynamics to justify why temperature corresponds to kinetic energy per molecule. It likely has to do with entropy and how a mixture of different ideal gasses in the particle model will equilibriate in a state where both component gasses in the mixture will end up with the same Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of per particle energies. The thermodynamic definition of temperature has to do with the partial derivative of entropy with respect to energy in an equilibrium state, thus grounding that concept in a theoretical sense.
For dummies like us, the derivation or the confirming experimental evidence are both unimportant. Only the fact that temperature [in an ideal gas] correlates with per particle kinetic energy is relevant.