Does Continuity Guarantee Half the Function Value in Convergent Sequences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sillyus sodus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a convergent sequence \( a_n \) approaching a limit \( a \) and a continuous function \( f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \). The goal is to demonstrate that there exists an integer \( N \) such that for all \( n > N \), the inequality \( f(a_n) \geq \frac{f(a)}{2} \) holds true.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of continuity and convergence, with one expressing confusion about how to start the problem. Another participant provides a counterexample using a constant function, questioning whether additional conditions are necessary. There is also mention of the \(\epsilon - \delta\) definition of continuity and how it relates to the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored. Some participants have suggested using the \(\epsilon - \delta\) definition of continuity as a potential pathway to the solution. Others have raised questions about the assumptions and conditions required for the original statement to hold.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that the function value \( f(a) \) must be positive for the inequality to hold, indicating a potential constraint in the problem setup. Additionally, there is a focus on the implications of choosing specific values for \(\epsilon\) in the context of continuity.

sillyus sodus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a convergent sequence:
a_n \rightarrow a
and a continuous function:
f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}
show that there exists an N\in\mathbb{N} such that \forall n>N:
f(a_n)\geq\frac{f(a)}{2}



Homework Equations


Usual definitions for limit of a sequence and continuous function.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried playing around with it but I really don't understand what to do, I know its an easy question and I feel pretty stupid but I'm stuck. Can anyone just get me started on this one?
So far I've rearranged it so it looks like:
f(a)-f(a_n)\leq f(a_n)
Which sort of looks like a limit without the abs values...
I figure that the function of a sequence is a sequence again, btu what am I trying to say here? That it is a divergent sequence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
False. Let f(x) = -1 (constant function). Let a_n =0 for all n. Here, f(a_n)=f(0)=-1 <-1/2 for all n, yet a_n:n=1,2,... converges in the domain if f.
[Is there another condition?]
 
Sorry, sorry, yes there is another condition:
f(a)&gt;0
 
To not give the answer away, I would just suggest that the problem is now a matter of
fitting into the \epsilon - \delta definition of continuous functions. Note that f(a)/2 < f(a).
 
Take \epsilon&gt; a/2 in the definition of "continuous function".
 
whaaaa.? So much for the 'for all epsilon >0' part. Whaaa? Well, not my problem anyway...
 
Yes, "For all epsilon> 0", something is true so it is true for any specific value of epsilon. Here we are given that f is continuous so we are free to choose any value of epsilon we like.
 
I have an answer now, basically because a_n\rightarrow a and f is continuous then f(a_n)\rightarrow f(a), so there exists n bigger than N such that |f(a_n)-f(a)|&lt;\epsilon so then just choose \epsilon = f(a)/2 do some rearranging and the inequality pops out.

In other words, f(a_n) is a convergent sequence.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K