Does element x present a linear resistance?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of resistance in an unspecified element, specifically questioning whether it exhibits linear resistance characteristics based on varying current and voltage measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of linear resistance and question the appropriateness of terminology used. There are requests for calculations and graphical representations to better understand resistance behavior. Some participants also raise concerns about measurement accuracy and significant figures.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on initial responses and suggesting further analysis through calculations and graphs. There is an ongoing exploration of the terminology and implications of the measurements, but no consensus has been reached regarding the nature of the resistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the data provided may be limited in precision due to significant figures, and there is a suggestion that the term 'linear resistance' may not be the most accurate descriptor for the situation being analyzed.

Purpleshinyrock
Messages
27
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Consider the element X represented in the figure, for which
know the voltage and current values indicated in the following table:
Relevant Equations
V=RI, R=V/I
ANSWER: element x does not present a linear resistance because it isn't constant as i and v increases.

Screenshot 2021-11-07 at 18-09-20 Microsoft Word - IC_EX_CAP1 - Exer_Cap1 pdf.png
Is my answer correct?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
It's close, but one of the readings is a bit off (to the 3 significant figures shown in the measurements). To be sure, it would be nice if they specified an accuracy for those measurements, IMO. It looks like the one flier measurement is only off by about 0.4%...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Purpleshinyrock
Perhaps you could show us your calculations of resistance at these various points? I find it easiest to graph these in a spreadsheet, myself. This will help us see if you are understanding the concept of resistance better than a simple yes/no response.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics, phinds and Purpleshinyrock
The term ‘linear resistance’ doesn’t seem appropriate. Is this a translation from another language or maybe part of a longer question? Maybe ‘constant resistance’ is what is intended.

The data supplied are given to only 2 or 3 significant figures. Rounding according to the usual convention gives:
R = 1.18/0.25 = 4.72Ω which rounded to 2 sig. figs. gives 4.7Ω
R = 2.35/0.50 = 4.70Ω which rounded to 2 sig. figs. gives 4.7 Ω
R = 5.88/1.25 – 4.704Ω which rounded to 3 sig. figs. gives 4.70 Ω
R = 9.40/2.00 = 4.70Ω which rounded to 3 sig. figs. gives 4.70 Ω

So my answer would be that: within the limits of the measurement-uncertainties, the resistance is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds and Purpleshinyrock

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
872
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K