Does G\H Form a Subgroup of G?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zorba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Subgroup
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In group theory, G\H does not form a subgroup of G. The notation G\H represents the set difference, which excludes elements of H from G, and does not satisfy the subgroup criteria. In contrast, G/H is the quotient group formed when H is a normal subgroup of G, allowing for well-defined coset multiplication. The identity element of G/H is He = H, and the canonical homomorphism from G to G/H maps elements of G to their corresponding cosets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically subgroups and quotient groups.
  • Familiarity with normal subgroups and their properties.
  • Knowledge of homomorphisms and their role in group theory.
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation, particularly the distinction between set difference (G\H) and quotient groups (G/H).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normal subgroups in detail.
  • Learn about canonical homomorphisms and their applications in group theory.
  • Explore examples of quotient groups and their significance in abstract algebra.
  • Investigate the implications of the identity element in various group structures.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone studying group theory who seeks clarity on the distinctions between subgroups and quotient groups.

Zorba
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Suppose G is a group and H is a subgroup of G. Then is G\H a subgroup itself? My feeling is it shouldn't be since 1\inH, therefore 1\notinG\H?

I'm getting a bit confused about this because I'm doing a homework sheet and the question deals with a homomorphism from G \rightarrow G\H and I'm wondering what happens to the identity element...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if H is a normal subgroup, then G/H is a group. It's not a subgroup of G though since its elements are the cosets eH=H, g_1H, g_2H, ..., which are the images of the elements of G under that mapping. maybe I misunderstood completely though, did you get / mixed up with \ ? because G\H usually means the set {g in G | g not in H}, while G/H means quotient group
 
I think your confusing some notation. G/H is different from G\H.
G\H is the set-difference and it is not a group. And certainly not a subgroup.
G/H is the quotient group, and it is a group (when H is normal). But it's not a subgroup (in general).
 
when H is a normal subgroup of G, G/H can be made into a group by setting coset multiplication as: (Hx)(Hy) = H(xy).

the condition of normality is necessary, because Hx is not uniquely determined by x (it has other members of G in it, as well), and if Hx ≠ xH (equivalently if xHx^-1 ≠ H), then the multiplication will not be well-defined.

there is a "canonical" homomorphism G-->G/H for any quotient group G/H of G, which sends the element g of G to the right (= left) coset Hg. the identity of G/H is He = H, which is also the kernel of the canonical homomorphism.

one way to look at such quotient (or factor) groups is to think of all the members of H being set arbitrarily to the identity, e. since the identity commutes with everything, the normality condition is akin to saying H has to "commute with every g" (this is NOT to say that hg = gh for every h in H. remember, we're "shrinking H to a point" so we can't really tell the difference between h and h' in H. so hg = gh' is the best we can say, they both get packed down into the coset Hg).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
637
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
966
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
990
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K