Does Gaining Weight Affect Mass?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Darrencc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Teaching Year
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between weight and mass, particularly in the context of teaching these concepts to eleven-year-olds. Participants explore how gaining weight relates to changes in mass, the conservation of mass, and the distinctions between mass and weight in both theoretical and practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that when a person gains weight, they also increase their mass, while noting that the mass of food consumed decreases correspondingly.
  • Others argue that mass is conserved in a closed system, but in an open system, such as when a person eats, mass can change as it is absorbed and excreted.
  • One participant suggests demonstrating mass changes using a scale with added objects to illustrate that mass can change when additional mass is added to a system.
  • There is a discussion about the common use of the term 'weight' in everyday language, which may lead to confusion regarding its technical definition.
  • Some participants express interest in practical demonstrations to help distinguish between mass and weight, including the effects of gravity and the concept of weightlessness.
  • Concerns are raised about students misunderstanding the concepts of weight and weightlessness, particularly in relation to mass.
  • One participant mentions that weight, as defined in physics, includes gravitational effects and may not be easily understood by younger students.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between mass and weight, with some asserting that mass changes when weight is gained, while others emphasize the conservation of mass in closed systems. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential misunderstanding of the terms weight and mass among students, the need for clear definitions, and the challenges of explaining abstract concepts to younger audiences.

Who May Find This Useful

Educators teaching physics concepts to young students, particularly those focusing on the differences between mass and weight, as well as the principles of conservation of mass and practical demonstrations in science education.

Darrencc
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Teaching eleven year olds about gravity
Hello,
I am teaching eleven year olds about gravity. There is no issue about this subject, however I would like someone to help with a model answer.
As mass never changes. What is the best answer when I am asked that if someone gets 'fatter', do they not put on mass?
Thanks in advance.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be explaining Conservation of Mass. I suggest that for an initial explanation for that age group, if someone becomes fatter, then of course, they have increased their mass. But the mass of food in the cupboard has decreased the same amount.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics, PeroK, hmmm27 and 1 other person
Darrencc said:
As mass never changes.
Mass of what never changes?

Put me, some food, and a toilet on a large weighing scale (edit: this needs an airtight container with oxygen supply too, since I'll be breathing). If I eat the food, absorb some of it across my gut wall and store it in my fat cells, then go to the toilet and excrete the molecules I did not absorb, the reading on the scale won't change. But the mass of food changes, my mass changes, and the mass of poo changes.

So all I did was move mass around, taking it from the food and absorbing some and excreting some. So my mass does change, because I added some matter, but the total mass of everything in the system did not change.

This is a trap people fall into all the time. A lot of laws apply to closed systems, where nothing enters or leaves. Mass is constant in a closed system. But in an open system where stuff can come in or out, it manifestly isn't constant, as the example of a person eating shows.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics, jack action and vanhees71
tech99 said:
You seem to be explaining Conservation of Mass. I suggest that for an initial explanation for that age group, if someone becomes fatter, then of course, they have increased their mass. But the mass of food in the cupboard has decreased the same amount.
Excellent. Very helpful, thank you
 
Ibix said:
Mass of what never changes?

Put me, some food, and a toilet on a large weighing scale (edit: this needs an airtight container with oxygen supply too, since I'll be breathing). If I eat the food, absorb some of it across my gut wall and store it in my fat cells, then go to the toilet and excrete the molecules I did not absorb, the reading on the scale won't change. But the mass of food changes, my mass changes, and the mass of poo changes.

So all I did was move mass around, taking it from the food and absorbing some and excreting some. So my mass does change, because I added some matter, but the total mass of everything in the system did not change.

This is a trap people fall into all the time. A lot of laws apply to closed systems, where nothing enters or leaves. Mass is constant in a closed system. But in an open system where stuff can come in or out, it manifestly isn't constant, as the example of a person eating shows.
Wonderful. Very helpful. Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
Place a brick or the like on a scale and show the read out to the class. Next, place another object on top of the brick. The class can see that the mass of something changes when you add mass to it.

The notion that the mass of a system remains constant is valid only for closed systems. In other words, if you don't add or subtract any matter from a system, its mass will stay the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Darrencc said:
As mass never changes. What is the best answer when I am asked that if someone gets 'fatter', do they not put on mass?
They do. We just use the term 'weight' more commonly in everyday parlance.
 
This might be a chance to teach the most useful general rule in all of science:

(Some of it) + (The rest of it) = (All of it)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog, anorlunda and jbriggs444
@Darrencc, are you trying to teach the (technical) difference between mass and weight?

Here’s an exercise which I have used with students (slightly older than yours).

You kick a foot-ball shaped stone. It hurts your foot!
You try to lift up the stone but it’s a bit too heavy.

You now travel to moon where the pull of gravity is about 6 times weaker than on earth.
On the moon:
- does it hurt as much when you kick the stone?
- can you lift up the stone?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and ergospherical
  • #10
Steve4Physics said:
You now travel to moon where the pull of gravity is about 6 times weaker than on earth.
On the moon:
- does it hurt as much when you kick the stone?
- can you lift up the stone?
How do you get your students to the Moon?
 
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, Herman Trivilino, Steve4Physics and 1 other person
  • #11
PeroK said:
How do you get your students to the Moon?
You put them on a rocket of course!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and PeroK
  • #12
Drakkith said:
You put them on a rocket of course!
Why didn't I think of that?!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Drakkith
  • #13
PeroK said:
How do you get your students to the Moon?
Did I not mention my first name is Elon?

(Not really though, or my username here would have to be elon4phsyics.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #14
PeroK said:
How do you get your students to the Moon?
Sorry to put the thread back on topic. :) But this is a good point. It is much better to come up things that can be demonstrated, or at least a part of the students' common experience.
 
  • #15
Drakkith said:
We just use the term 'weight' more commonly in everyday parlance.
This is something that needs to be explicitly pointed out to the students. The word weight has multiple meanings, it can either refer to mass or to a force. The word weight is actually legally defined as what we refer to as mass. The distinction between force and mass is the important distinction for students to understand. I go so far as to refer to it as the weight force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, Steve4Physics and PeroK
  • #16
Mister T said:
Sorry to put the thread back on topic. :) But this is a good point. It is much better to come up things that can be demonstrated, or at least a part of the students' common experience.
Agreed. But as a teaching-exercise, used alongside other material of course, I've found it generates useful discussion and thought.

I'd be interested in any practical demonstration to distinguish between mass and weight if anyone knows of any.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #17
X
Steve4Physics said:
Agreed. But as a teaching-exercise, used alongside other material of course, I've found it generates useful discussion and thought.

I'd be interested in any practical demonstration to distinguish between mass and weight if anyone knows of any.
Students may be able to experience weightlessness for an instant on amusement park rides.
1646936323493.png
 
  • #18
anorlunda said:
X

Students may be able to experience weightlessness for an instant on amusement park rides.
View attachment 298220
But the problem (explaining the difference between mass and weight) remains. E.g. what do you say to the student who claims they were weightless and therefore also massless?

Also, if defining weight as a gravitational force, freefall is not true weightlessness. Maybe call it apparent weightlessness to avoid conflict with the definition.
 
  • #19
I can see no use for the concepts of weight and weightlessness in physics. There are mass, gravity and contact forces. That covers everything.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
There are 4 fundamental interactions (stron, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational), but I think you can't discuss it in this abstract way with 11-yo students, and to get the issue of the difference between mass and gravitational force ##mg## on Earth right even at higher grades. The idea with the moon seems to be good although I guess one must not underestimate the level of abstraction this thought experiment also needs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
  • #21
PeroK said:
I can see no use for the concepts of weight and weightlessness in physics. There are mass, gravity and contact forces. That covers everything.
Weight, as typically defined in physics, includes the effects of both gravity and Earth's spin.
 
  • #22
Steve4Physics said:
I'd be interested in any practical demonstration to distinguish between mass and weight if anyone knows of any.
The effort needed to push a car on level ground with transmission disengaged. i.e. to manually overcome its resistance to acceleration, demonstrates its mass. and the effort required to lift it, or to lift part of it with a jack, against gravity, demonstrates its weight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, nasu and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
762
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K