I Does gravitational energy travel like electrical energy?

Click For Summary
Electrons flowing through a resistor dissipate electrical energy, which is transported from the battery via the Poynting vector's curved field lines. The discussion raises the question of whether a similar concept applies to gravitational energy, using the example of sand falling through the air. It suggests that gravitational energy may not travel in the same way as electrical energy, as localizing energy in a gravitational field is complex and often elusive. While there are instances, like gravitational waves and the Penrose process, where energy transfer through gravitational fields can be argued, a definitive answer about gravitational energy flow remains elusive. Overall, the dynamics of gravitational energy differ significantly from those of electrical energy.
Orthoceras
Messages
125
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
Does gravitational energy travel like electrical energy?
Electrons flowing through a resistor are dissipating electrical energy. The electrical energy is transported from the battery to the electrons along the curved field lines of the Poynting vector. It seems like a meaningful idea that electrical energy necessarily travels from the source to the dissipation site.

My question is, does this idea somehow apply to gravitational energy as well? For example, consider a steady stream of sand falling through the air, from a funnel to the ground. Is the gravitational energy actually transported from the source (i.e., the funnel or the ground) to the dissipation site, where sand particles experience air resistance? If not, does gravitational energy not travel? Is gravitational energy more elusive than electrical energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a lot of similarities between electromagnetism and gravity, but there are a lot of differences too. When thinking about flowing "charge" you have to remember that there are no opposite charges, so there's nothing quite like a current in a wire with a net zero charge. Also, like charges attract so the dynamics are rather different. Furthermore, localising energy in a gravitational field is notoriously difficult in all but the very simplest of circumstances, so it can prove very difficult to ask (rigorously) if energy has flowed anywhere.

So, as far as I understand it the "answer" to your query in general is that we don't really have a way to answer.

However, there are cases where you can argue that energy has transferred through the gravitational field. Gravitational waves are one such - Feynman pointed out that a pair of beads on a straight wire should move together and apart under the influence of a passing gravitational wave, and friction with the wire would generate heat, presumably sapping energy from the wave. And you can use the Penrose process to sap angular momentum from a black hole, again presumably passing energy through the field since there's nothing to touch.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 236 ·
8
Replies
236
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K