In field theory:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[H,P]=0

So shouldn't that mean there can be no scattering? If you have momentum state |p1p2> then it is an eigenvalue of P with eigenvalue p1+p2. But it should be a simultaneous eigenstate of H too, so

e^(-iHt)|p1p2>= |p1p2> up to a phase factor.

But in general, |p1p2> can go into |p3p4> so long as p1+p2=p3+p4. However, the above argument seems to say that |p1p2> must stay at |p1p2>.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Does [H,P]=0 imply no scattering in field theory?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Does imply scattering | Date |
---|---|

I Why does a quantum system with many degrees of freedom imply orthogonality? | Jan 21, 2018 |

I Does MWI imply solipsism? | Nov 8, 2017 |

B Does Heisenberg's uncertainty principle imply no free will? | Sep 1, 2017 |

I Does realism imply locality or vice versa? | May 10, 2017 |

B Does quantum physics imply the existence of randomness? | Jun 2, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**