Does Helicity or Chirality Govern the Weak Process in Neutrino Interactions?

bubble
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A left handed neutrino (chirality) can be seen with a right helicity due to a lorentz boost. Can this neutrino interact ? Yes because it is still left-handed chirality ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is "yes". The interaction cares about chirality, not helicity.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
@Orodruin is our resident neutrino expert :)
He is also relatively indisposable at the moment. :rolleyes:
V50 seems to be handling this just fine.
 
Thanks !
But in fact I am not sure it is right...
Look double beta decay : right (chirality) antineutrino is first emitted, then its helicity is flipped (massive neutrino) : it becomes a left helicity antineutrino still with right chirality. And, if Majorana, this left helicity antineutrino is equal to a left helicity neutrino which is absorbed by the second neutron...
From the beginning to the end it is a right chiral particle and a right chiral particle cannot give the weak process V-A : n + neutrino -> p + e-
So here it seems that the process is governed by the helicity ! and not by the chirality ! This is where I am lost...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top