Does hooke's law account for the force of friction on a horizontal spring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Hooke's Law in the context of vertical and horizontal springs, particularly regarding the effects of gravity and friction on the net force acting on the spring system.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether the net force for an ideal spring is always represented as Fnet = -kx, questioning the inclusion of gravitational forces for vertical springs.
  • There is a discussion about whether Hooke's Law accounts for friction in horizontal springs, with participants considering how to express the net force when friction is present.
  • Some participants raise questions about the signs used in force equations, particularly in relation to the direction of forces acting on vertical springs.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between spring force, gravitational force, and friction. There is an exploration of sign conventions and their implications for the equations used, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive formulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of force balance equations, particularly in the context of different orientations of springs and the effects of external forces like gravity and friction. The discussion reflects a need for careful consideration of sign conventions and the definitions of displacement in relation to Hooke's Law.

joej24
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Whether or not the spring is vertical or not, assuming that the spring is ideal, is Fnet always equal to -kx?

Is it incorrect to write the sum of the forces of a vertical spring as Fnet = -kx - mg?

And does hooke's law account for the force of friction on a horizontal spring? If not would the sum of the forces look like this? Fnet = -kx - \muN


Homework Equations


F = -kx


The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
joej24 said:

Homework Statement


Whether or not the spring is vertical or not, assuming that the spring is ideal, is Fnet always equal to -kx?

No, for a vertical spring, you do have to include gravity.

joej24 said:
Is it incorrect to write the sum of the forces of a vertical spring as Fnet = -kx - mg?

For a vertical spring, this is in fact correct.

joej24 said:
And does hooke's law account for the force of friction on a horizontal spring? If not would the sum of the forces look like this? Fnet = -kx - \muN

Hooke's law doesn't include friction automatically. Hooke's law has to do with the spring restoring force only. If there is friction, you have to include it explicitly. The way you did it there is ok, but be careful with the signs. Friction always opposes the motion, so if the mass is moving in the + direction, the frictional force is negative, and if the mass is moving in the - direction, the frictional force is positive. So there isn't one equation that will be correct at all times.
 
If a vertical spring is hanging and at rest, its net force = 0.
So that means F = 0 = -kx - mg, but doesn't the force of the spring oppose the force of gravity? How does this make sense? The force of gravity always points downward ( is negative), but -kx is negative when the spring is stretched and at rest.
 
joej24 said:
If a vertical spring is hanging and at rest, its net force = 0.
So that means F = 0 = -kx - mg, but doesn't the force of the spring oppose the force of gravity? How does this make sense? The force of gravity always points downward ( is negative), but -kx is negative when the spring is stretched and at rest.

This is a case where you have to be careful about signs. First of all, the length that goes into Hooke's law is a displacement. I'll use the symbol 'y' instead of 'x', since y is usually used for the vertical position coordinate, and x for the horizontal position coordinate. Hooke's law should really be written as:

F = -kΔy​

where

Δy ≡ y - y0

In this expression, y0 is the position at which the spring is neither stretched nor compressed. The reason we can write F = -ky is because, in general we can choose the origin of our coordinate system to be at y0 (i.e. we can choose y0 = 0) so that all other positions are measured from this reference point. But the key point here is that y is the spring displacement and as such, it is a vector. At the very least, for a 1D situation, y must have an intrinsic sign (+ or -) that tells you which direction this displacement is in.

Next, we come to sign conventions. This is another case where we have the freedom to choose something. Gravity points downward. So, if you write F = -mg, you've implicity chosen the sign convention that "downward is negative" (i.e. downward is the negative y direction). If so, this affects the sign of the displacement y. In the force balance equation,

F = -mg - ky,​

if you stretch the spring, then the position of the mass goes down below the position at which the spring is undisplaced. Since downward is negative, this means that the displacement is negative: y < 0. But if y is negative, then it follows that the spring force is positive: -ky > 0. So, when the spring is stretched, the spring force is positive and points upward, counteracting gravity, just as you would expect. Similarly, if the spring is compressed, then the position, y, of the mass goes up above the position at which the spring is undisplaced. In other words the displacement is positive: y > 0. As a result, -ky < 0 and a compressed spring has a restoring force that points downward, just as you would expect.

You are free, of course, to choose the opposite sign convention in which "downward is positive". Under this sign convention, we write gravity as F = +mg, and the total force becomes:

F = mg - ky​

Now, if the mass is initially at y = 0 (the position for which the spring is undisplaced) and then you stretch it by a small amount, its new position is physically below the zero-point. Since downward has been defined to be positive, it follows that the displacement is positive: y > 0. Therefore -ky < 0, and the spring force points in the negative direction (upward) just as one would expect. If the spring is compressed, the the mass moves above the zero-point. Since upward is negative, it follows that the displacement is negative: y < 0. As a result, -ky > 0, and the force for a compressed spring points in the positive (downward) direction as one would expect.

This second sign convention is perhaps more intuitive, since a positive displacement in y corresponds to spring extension (lengthening) and a negative displacement in y corresponds to spring compression (shortening).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K