Does Integral Transformation Apply in Equality of Modified Bessel Functions?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the equality of two integrals involving modified Bessel functions. The first integral is derived using a substitution related to the modified Bessel function K_0(x), while the second integral is linked to a convolution integral for exponential random variables. Numerical integration suggests that the equality holds, but participants are exploring transformations to confirm this. A substitution of variables, specifically u = 2z, is proposed to simplify the first integral. Clarifications on the differential transformation are also addressed, emphasizing the importance of accurate variable changes in integral calculus.
Combinatus
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
Change of variables for integral

Homework Statement



Determine whether the following equality holds:

\displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(x^2+4z^2)}{4z}}}{2z} \, \mathrm{d}z = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(1+z^2)x}{2z}}}{2z} \, \mathrm{d}z, \forall x,z \in \mathbb R_+

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I obtained the first integral after fiddling around with the integral

K_0(x) := \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} e^{-x\cdot\cosh{z}} \, \mathrm{d}z

using the substitution \tau := \dfrac{xe^z}{2}. Note that K_0(x) is a modified Bessel function of the second kind of order 0. The second integral was something I came across after playing around with Rohatgi's "product convolution" integral for independent exponential random variables for a while. Mathematica claims that the second integral is also K_0(x), and numerical integration seems to show that the original equality holds. The integrals look similar enough that some simple transformation seems relevant, but I haven't managed to find one yet.

Obviously, determining how Mathematica concluded that the second integral is K_0(x) would be helpful, too.

Hints?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try substituting a simple multiple of z.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Substituting u=2z in the first integral yields

\displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(x^2+4z^2)}{4z}}}{2z} \, \mathrm{d}z = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(x^2+u^2)}{2u}}}{2u} \, \mathrm{d}u.

Not bad! I'll try out some more elementary transformations tomorrow. Thanks!
 
If u = 2z, the lower denominator of the transformed integral (originally 2z) should be u rather than 2u.
 
SteamKing said:
If u = 2z, the lower denominator of the transformed integral (originally 2z) should be u rather than 2u.

Well, maybe I'm too tired, but isn't \mathrm{d}z=\dfrac{\mathrm{d}u}{2}?
 
Combinatus said:
Well, maybe I'm too tired, but isn't \mathrm{d}z=\dfrac{\mathrm{d}u}{2}?

You are correct.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K