Does it matter which eigenvectors

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
If you solve the Schrödinger equation time independent and find a number of stationary position states they are eigenstates. So say uou find the eigen state ψ then c*ψ is also an eigenstate, Does it matter which of these I pick as the eigenstate or is it only the eigenvalue that matters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We generally require our states to be normalized. This still let's you choose the overall complex phase of the state. You can take this phase to be anything you want, because the overall phase is not physical (i.e., not measurable).
 
By the First postulte of Quantum Mechanics, state is the most important thing, it contains all the information that can be known, eigen value will give you just the probablity, state is what we really intend to look for!
 
sugeet said:
By the First postulte of Quantum Mechanics, state is the most important thing, it contains all the information that can be known, eigen value will give you just the probablity, state is what we really intend to look for!
Eigenvalues are what one can measure in experiments.
 
eigen value of a particular eigen state, its the probablity of the state!
 
sugeet said:
eigen value of a particular eigen state, its the probablity of the state!
Are you thinking of expansion coefficients? The eigenvalues are not probabilities.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top