Does Lorentz Factor Appear in General Relativity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lorentz factor, denoted as γ, plays a limited role in general relativity (GR), primarily appearing in local inertial frames where the metric is flat. It is relevant when converting between different frames, such as in the derivation of the stress-energy tensor for fluids in non-flat spacetimes. The discussion highlights that both gravitational and kinematic time dilation contribute to relativistic effects, such as the precession of orbits, exemplified by Mercury's orbit around the Sun. The relationship between gravitational and kinematic time dilation is established through formulas involving the Schwarzschild metric and the average orbit radius.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, particularly the Schwarzschild metric.
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor (γ) and its implications in special relativity.
  • Knowledge of stress-energy tensor components and their significance in GR.
  • Basic grasp of gravitational and kinematic time dilation effects.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the stress-energy tensor in non-flat spacetimes.
  • Explore the implications of the Schwarzschild metric on time dilation and gravitational effects.
  • Investigate the role of local inertial frames in general relativity.
  • Learn about relativistic precession and its mathematical formulation.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the interplay between special and general relativity, particularly in the context of time dilation and gravitational effects.

  • #31
... The reason I'm wondering about this is because where two bodies undergoing rectilinear motion, passing each other at high velocity, it seems non-intuitive that they could appear as black holes to each other (if the rest+kinetic energy vs. body volume ratio were adequate).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
shalayka said:
... The reason I'm wondering about this is because where two bodies undergoing rectilinear motion, passing each other at high velocity, it seems non-intuitive that they could appear as black holes to each other (if the rest+kinetic energy vs. body volume ratio were adequate).
Your intuition is right, it won't become a black hole. It seems that people associate high intensity gravitational fields with black holes and that isn't really the case. Its possible to have a naked singularity in which case the intensity of the gravitational field increases without bound and yet there is no event horizon associated with it. An infinitely long mass filament is just such an object.

If you look carefully at that paper I sent you a link to you will see that the author addresses this very question.

Pete
 
  • #33
Correction: That last post was inaccurate:

Your intuition is right, it won't become a black hole. I don't understand why people would believe that it would. Granted that the intensity of the gravitational field will increase with an increase in velocity but an object which is not a black hold cannot become a black hole by a mere change in reference frames.

If you look carefully at that paper I sent you a link to you will see that the author addresses this very question.

Pete
 
  • #34
shalayka said:
... The reason I'm wondering about this is because where two bodies undergoing rectilinear motion, passing each other at high velocity, it seems non-intuitive that they could appear as black holes to each other (if the rest+kinetic energy vs. body volume ratio were adequate).
Recall that a black hole is an object whose mass resides entirely within a partcular surface. In the rest frame of the object this surface is a sphere as measured whose radius is less than or equal to the Schwarzschild radius. If that is true in one frame of reference then its true in all frames of reference.

How was the article? Did you find time to read it yet? I have a lot of articles on this whole topic of mass if you'd like to read any of them.

Pete
 
  • #35
Sorry Pete, I got sidetracked in a big way this week, so I didn't end up looking at the articles. :( I would love to read the ones you have on mass as well though! This week will be very quiet for me, so I will definitely have ample time then.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K