Does Momentum Change in Horizontal Direction When Mass is Lowered?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a scenario involving a cart moving at a constant velocity on a frictionless surface, where an object is tossed off the cart in a direction perpendicular to its motion. Participants are exploring whether this action affects the horizontal speed of the cart due to changes in mass.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are debating the implications of conservation of momentum in relation to the change in mass of the cart. Some express confusion about how mass removal affects horizontal velocity, while others question the assumptions about forces and acceleration.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of differing viewpoints regarding the conservation of momentum and its application to the problem. Some participants have acknowledged errors in their reasoning, and hints have been provided to guide understanding without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of a frictionless environment and the nature of forces acting on the system. There is a noted concern about mixing frames of reference in the analysis.

Nikkolas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are on a cart going at a constant velocity on a frictionless surface. You toss something off the cart in a direction that is perpendicular to your motion, thus lowering the mass of the cart/you system. Does the speed in the horizontal direction change?

Person 1 says: No, because you exerted a force in the perpendicular direction, thus it doesn't affect the car's horizontal motion.

Person 2 says: Yes, because the total momentum of the system is conserved due to the lack of a net external force, thus the horizontal component of momentum is also conserved, thus the change in mass of the cart automatically increases its speed in the horizontal direction.

Who's right?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Nikkolas! Welcome to PF! :wink:

Tell us which you think is right, and why, and we'll comment on it! :smile:
 
I think the second person is right. Conservation of momentum is valid just because there is no external net force acting on the entire system. The momentum in both components should be conserved then. This means that the mass thrown off the cart should be compensated with a greater cart velocity in the direction it was traveling in.

But then again, I can't imagine something accelerating in a certain direction (horizontal in this case) unless a component of the net force was exerted on that something in that direction (there is no horizontal force exerted on either object). I'm honestly stumped.

Hi tiny-tim! Thank you for the welcome and thank you for the advice!
 
Nikkolas said:
Person 2 says: … the horizontal component of momentum is also conserved, thus the change in mass of the cart automatically increases its speed in the horizontal direction.
Nikkolas said:
I think the second person is right. Conservation of momentum is valid just because there is no external net force acting on the entire system. The momentum in both components should be conserved then. This means that the mass thrown off the cart should be compensated with a greater cart velocity in the direction it was traveling in.

(i wish you wouldn't keep saying "the horizontal direction" … both directions are horizontal :rolleyes:)

Why should the change in mass of the cart cause a change in the speed of the cart?
 
I apologize. I'll stick to x,y,z. lol.

It shouldn't. Net forces cause accelerations, not changes in mass. If the floor is frictionless and a cart is moving at a constant speed, me removing a mass shouldn't make it go faster or slower. This is what I think, but the conservation of momentum keeps on slapping me in the face.
 
Well, momentum is mass times speed, and Person 2 is saying that conservation of momentum means that lower cart mass means higher cart speed … what is wrong with that? :wink:
 
I caught mine and #2's error. I mixed my frames of reference, so I didn't take into consideration the component of the projectile's momentum along the direction in which the cart is traveling. Cool. Number 1 wins. Thank you for the hints, tiny-tim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K