B Does more energy mean more work?

AI Thread Summary
More energy correlates with increased work, as demonstrated by the potential energy (PE) of an object at height, like a ball thrown upward. The higher the object, the more work it can do, similar to water in a dam, where increased water height allows for greater energy production through turbines. The energy in systems, such as water cycles, is influenced by solar energy that elevates water to clouds, which eventually replenishes dam levels through rain. However, the total energy remains constant; when a ball reaches maximum height, its potential energy peaks, but the overall energy does not increase. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between energy and work in various physical systems.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
As we always say eat food and rest because tomorrow you have to go to work. When we throw a ball up, it gains a max PE at some height. More the height more energy it has which makes it do more work. Is this right to say?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the higher the level of water in a dam, the more work the flow of water can do onto the blades of the water turbines-generators, which can produce more electrical energy.

Previously, the Sun energy via evaporation increased the potential energy of the water of rivers, lakes and sea up to the clouds level.
Then, rain replenished the water level in our dam.

Please, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroelectricity#Conventional_(dams)
 
Last edited:
Not exactly. The ball has all of the energy that it's going to have when you release it. Some is Kinetic (velocity) and some is potential (height). When it stops at max height, the potential energy is maximized but the total energy is unchanged.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top