Work done in lifting and lowering an object

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the work done in lifting and lowering an object, specifically focusing on the kinetic and potential energy changes during the process. Participants explore the mechanics of lifting a book from one shelf to another, addressing concepts of work, energy transfer, and the forces involved in different phases of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that in uniform motion, the kinetic energy change is zero, leading to the conclusion that the work done by the applied force equals the work done by gravity.
  • Others argue that while the kinetic energy can be zero at the start and end of the lifting process, it is not always zero during the motion, as it can transition to non-zero values when the object accelerates.
  • There is a discussion about the phases of motion: acceleration when the applied force exceeds gravitational force, constant velocity when forces balance, and deceleration when gravitational force exceeds the applied force.
  • Some participants express confusion over the definitions and notation used in the discussion, questioning the clarity of the terms and their application to the problem.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of clearly defining terms and phases of motion to facilitate understanding of the work-energy relationship during the lifting process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the relationship between work done, kinetic energy, and the forces involved in lifting and lowering the object. The discussion remains unresolved with differing interpretations of the energy dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clearer definitions of terms and quantities used in the discussion. There are also unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about the motion phases and the relationships between work and energy.

  • #31
Lnewqban said:
The lifting force is whatever force is necessary to overcome gravity, it can't be less.
If the object is moving upward and slowing down, the lifting force is less than ##mg##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rudransh verma
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
rudransh verma said:
But there is a confusion here in W=Fd , d is the distance up to which the force is applied and up to which the body travels. It’s not a momentary push.
What's a "momentary push"? It has to last for some length of time, and during that time the object moves a distance ##d##.
 
  • #33
Mister T said:
What's a "momentary push"? It has to last for some length of time, and during that time the object moves a distance ##d##.
Oh! It’s the same thing.
 
  • #34
Ibix said:
You can use a very high force for a very short distance and throw the book on to the shelf. Or you can use a force barely stronger than the weight and lift the book smoothly. Either way, the work done by the force is the same.
When using high forces for very short distance mean momentary push. In my book resnik they are not using this thing but constant force throughout the motion and displacement. Even though after a set time both will produce same change in energy.
 
  • #35
rudransh verma said:
In my book resnik they are not using this thing but constant force throughout the motion and displacement.
If the book starts and stops, they cannot be using constant force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
842
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K