Does My Router Need a Faraday Cage to Protect Me From Harmful Radiation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the necessity of placing a household router in a Faraday cage to reduce exposure to radiated signals that some participants believe could be harmful to human health. The scope includes concerns about electromagnetic radiation from routers and the effectiveness of shielding methods.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the need for a Faraday cage, suggesting that manufacturers have already shielded routers adequately to prevent harmful radiation.
  • One participant notes that placing a router in a Faraday cage would impair its WiFi performance, implying that such shielding may not be practical.
  • Another participant emphasizes that all electronic devices, including routers, undergo electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing to ensure they do not emit harmful levels of RF signals.
  • A participant humorously compares the idea of using a Faraday cage for routers to the absurdity of wearing tinfoil hats, suggesting that fear drives the marketing of such products.
  • One suggestion is made to create a Faraday cage around the bed using brass flywire, which could provide RF attenuation while also serving to keep out insects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and practicality of using a Faraday cage for routers. There is no consensus on whether such measures are warranted or effective.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference regulatory standards for RF emissions and the testing processes that devices undergo, but there is no detailed exploration of the specific health implications of RF exposure or the effectiveness of Faraday cages in this context.

Ainokea
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Is there a need to put a household router in a faraday cage to cut down on radiated signals that could damage the human body? I would think the manufacturer's would have shielded what needs to be shielded. I see these advertised on Amazon among other places. My router sits about 6 feet from my bed.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ainokea said:
Is there a need to put a household router in a faraday cage to cut down on radiated signals that could damage the human body? I would think the manufacturer's would have shielded what needs to be shielded. I see these advertised on Amazon among other places. My router sits about 6 feet from my bed.
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

I assume you're not asking about WiFi routers, since putting one in a shielded enclosure would greatly impair the WiFi performance. :wink:

All routers (and pretty much all electronic appliances) need to be tested for electromagnetic interference (EMI) before they can be sold. In the US, the testing is done per FCC rules, and you end up getting the ability to put a FCC logo on your product label to show that you've passed that testing. EMI testing is to ensure that you will not put out RF signals that can cause interference with radio, TV and other users of the airwaves. The limits are pretty low, so you are not going to be exposed to much of anything from a non-RF-transmitting appliance.

And for "intentional radiators" like WiFi routers, cellphones, etc., there are limits to the amplitude of the RF they can put out at their licensed frequencies. That is also part of the FCC testing in the US (and other agency testing in other countries). Again, the allowed RF output from such devices (that can be located close to you) is fairly small.

https://motorolamentor.zendesk.com/...ments/209465468/MG7550_Label_SSID_Sec_Key.jpg

1583690807404.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, sysprog, dlgoff and 1 other person
Ainokea said:
Is there a need to put a household router in a faraday cage to cut down on radiated signals that could damage the human body?
If you put the router in a Faraday cage how is it supposed to work then?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and sysprog
Ainokea said:
Is there a need to put a household router in a faraday cage to cut down on radiated signals that could damage the human body?
Fear is a great marketing tool. The need to put your router in a Faraday cage is the same as the need to line your hat with tinfoil.
Ainokea said:
My router sits about 6 feet from my bed.
Then why not build a Faraday cage from brass flywire that encloses the bed. That will give a significant attenuation to RF radiation. It will improve your health by keeping out biting insects.
 
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, davenn, phinds and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
18K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K