Does One Need Linear Algebra 'before' Spivak's Calculus?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Linear Algebra is not a prerequisite for studying Spivak's "Calculus," which focuses on single-variable calculus and does not utilize linear algebra concepts. However, it is recommended to study Linear Algebra alongside or before transitioning to vector-based calculus, particularly when progressing to Calculus III, which involves multiple variables and vector calculus. The discussion highlights that while some advanced calculus texts integrate Linear Algebra, Spivak's approach remains independent of it, making it suitable for those focusing solely on foundational calculus concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of single-variable calculus concepts.
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs and rigor.
  • Basic knowledge of vector calculus for advanced studies.
  • Exposure to different types of calculus (Calculus I, II, III).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Spivak's "Calculus" for a rigorous approach to single-variable calculus.
  • Learn Linear Algebra concepts, focusing on vectors, matrices, and determinants.
  • Explore vector calculus to understand multi-variable calculus applications.
  • Review advanced calculus texts such as Wilfred Kaplan's and Tom Apostol's for comparative insights.
USEFUL FOR

Students transitioning from applied to theoretical mathematics, educators teaching calculus, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of calculus concepts and their interrelations.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
So I am attempting to reteach myself Calculus with some rigor. So do I need Linear Algebra before Spivak's Calculus or along with? (Or at all?)

Thanks,
Casey
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Saladsamurai said:
So I am attempting to reteach myself Calculus with some rigor. So I need Linear Algebra before Spivak's Calculus or along with? (Or at all?)
That's an interesting question. I've seen advanced calculus taught with LA, with elements of LA and without LA. In my experience, Linear Algebra should be taught before or early in conjunction with calculus.

Based on the other thread, I looked at some of my old (1970's) texts on advanced calculus: Wilfred Kaplan's (2/E) and Francis Hildebrand's Advanced Calculus texts. Kaplan's book has linear algebra in the first chapter, whereas Hildebrand's does not. Perhaps Hildebrand assumed that a science or engineering student at that point would have had a course in LA. I took a course in linear algebra during my second year at university.

Advanced Calculus, 5/E
Wilfred Kaplan, University of Michigan
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/educator/product/Advanced-Calculus/9780201799378.page

1. Vectors and Matrices.

Introduction.
Vectors in Space.
Linear Independence
Lines and Planes.
Determinants.
Simultaneous Linear Equations.
Matrices.
Addition of Matrices
Scalar Times Matrix.
Multiplication of Matrices.
Inverse of a Square Matrix.
Gaussian Elimination.
*Eigenvalues of a Square Matrix.
*The Transpose.
*Orthogonal Matrices.
Analytic Geometry and Vectors n-Dimensional Space.
*Axioms for Vn.
Linear Mappings.
*Subspaces
Rank of a Matrix.
*Other Vector Spaces.

2. Differential Calculus of Functions of Several Variables.
3. Vector Differential Calculus.
4. Integral Calculus of Functions of Several Variables.
5. Vector Integral Calculus.
6. Infinite Series.
7. Fourier Series and Orthogonal Functions.
8. Functions of a Complex Variable.
9. Ordinary Differential Equations.
10. Partial Differential Equations.


Advanced Calculus for Applications, 2/E
Francis B. Hildebrand, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/educ...-Calculus-for-Applications/9780130111890.page

1. Ordinary Differential Equations.
2. The Laplace Transform.
3. Numerical Methods for Solving Ordinary Differential Equations.
4. Series Solutions of Differential Equations; Special Functions. Boundary-Value Problems and Characteristic-Function Representations.
5. Vector Analysis.
6. Topics in Higher-Dimensional Calculus.
7. Partial Differential Equations.
8. Solutions of Partial Differential Equations.
9. Solutions of Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics.
10. Functions of a Complex Variable.
11. Applications of Analytic Function Theory.


Compare those two books with Spivak's book and Tom Apostol's Mathematical Analysis: A Modern Approach to Advanced Calculus, 2/E
(Tom M. Apostol, California Institute of Technology)
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/educ...roach-to-Advanced-Calculus/9780201002881.page

1. The Real and Complex Number Systems.
2. Some Basic Notions of Set Theory.
3. Elements of Point Set Topology.
4. Limits and Continuity.
5. Derivatives.
6. Functions of Bounded Variation and Rectifiable Curves.
7. The Riemann-Stieltjes Integral.
8. Infinite Series and Infinite Products.
9. Sequences of Functions.
10. The Lebesgue Integral.
11. Fourier Series and Fourier Integrals.
12. Multivariable Differential Calculus.
13. Implicit Functions and Extremum Problems.
14. Multiple Riemann Integrals.
15. Multiple Lebesgue Integrals.
16. Cauchy's Theorem and the Residue Calculus.
 
At my university Calculus I and II are taught in the first year along with Linear Algebra. (I should say Mathematical Analysis since it's a proof based Calculus course) Calculus II and Linear Algebra are taught the same semester, so that when we start to study Calculus III we already know some Linear Algebra which is indeed important because you have to deal with determinants, vector spaces, etc.

But if you're studying single variable calculus then I don't think Linear Algebra will be of any use. If I remember well, Spivak's Calculus is of one variable, so sincerely I don't think Linear Algebra to be of any use.
Basically you'll prove all the theorems up to infinite series one. There is absolutely no need of Linear Algebra knowledge up to this, in my opinion.
It's a different story if you're looking to study vector based calculus though.
 
Thanks for the great responses guys.

Should one study Spivak before 'vector-based' Calculus or are they independent of each other? What is the difference?

There seem to be too many different types of calculus. What order does one preferably study them in?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Thanks for the great responses guys.

Should one study Spivak before 'vector-based' Calculus or are they independent of each other? What is the difference?

There seem to be too many different types of calculus. What order does one preferably study them in?

Spivak's Calculus is Calculus I and II if I remember well.
Yes you should first learn well this and later move on to vector based calculus.
Usually Calculus I consist of continuity of functions, limits of functions and sequences, derivatives, injective/bijective function, even/uneven functions, etc.
Calculus II deals with integral calculus, infinite series, Taylor series and probably more.
All this is with one variable functions.
While calculus III is basically very similar to calculus I and II but with several variables. Yes, there's a big difference and in order to tackle this course I think it's very nice to have a Linear Algebra course under your belt.
That's my personal experience. (I just finished my calculus 3 course)

Thus if you plan to study the whole Calculus sequence, I suggest you to study Linear Algebra along with Spivak's Calculus and when you're done with them, start with Vector Calculus.
 
Saladsamurai said:
There seem to be too many different types of calculus. What order does one preferably study them in?

Often you see universities label their calculus classes I-III(IV), each corresponding to a different subject matter:
Calc I: Differential calculus of a single variable
Calc II: Integral calculus of a single variable + taylor series
Calc III: Differential and integral calculus of multiple variables, vector calculus
Calc IV (sometimes): Ordinary differential equations

Certainly it makes sense to study I -> II -> III, as it is a logical progression, but IV does not necessarily come after III. Linear algebra plays a part in several proofs from calc III, but like fluidistic says it is largely irrelevant for I, II.

So, I think the best place for LA would be between calc II and III, assuming you do want the level of rigor in proving most of the theorems.
 
Okay. Well as odd as this may sound, I have already taken Calculus 1-4. We just never called Calculus 3 "Vector Calculus."

I am in Engineering, so it was from a more applied standpoint. I wish to reteach myself calculus from a more theoretical standpoint.

Spivak has been highly recommended to me for this purpose. I am looking for some rigor and to gain some experience with proofs.

I feel like some mathematical maturity is in order and that it will benefit me greatly in my self-study of more advanced physics topics.
 
No

Spivack's "Calculus" neither presupposes nor uses linear algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K