Does Principia Mathematica Live Up to Its Name?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skywo1f
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perceived lack of mathematical content in "Principia Mathematica" by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, with participants expressing frustration over its philosophical focus. Users recommend supplementary texts for learning mathematical proofs, specifically George Polya's "How to Solve It" and Daniel J. Velleman's "How to Prove It." The consensus indicates that "Principia Mathematica" is overly specialized and may not suit the average mathematician, as it dedicates extensive pages to proving basic concepts like one plus one equals two.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mathematical concepts, including natural numbers.
  • Familiarity with philosophical logic and its implications in mathematics.
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof techniques.
  • Exposure to foundational texts in mathematics, particularly those addressing axiomatic systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read George Polya's "How to Solve It" for insights on problem-solving in mathematics.
  • Study Daniel J. Velleman's "How to Prove It" for a structured approach to mathematical proofs.
  • Explore introductory Linear Algebra textbooks that also cover proof techniques.
  • Investigate Gödel's incompleteness theorems to understand limitations in formal systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those interested in mathematical proofs and foundational theories, as well as anyone evaluating the relevance of "Principia Mathematica" in modern mathematical discourse.

skywo1f
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
so I've been studying principia mathematica by whitehead and russell.
it seems like its all principia and no mathematica. it just feels like I am taking philosophy logic again.

does it get more mathy later?

any books that will help me with math proofs?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For proofs, have a look at George Polya's How to solve it. Another book that has been recommended to me (but I have less experience with it) is How to read and do proofs.

Principia is extremely specialized. The old joke about it is that it takes hundreds of pages to "prove" that one plus one equals two. If you're really interested in the topic then by all means delve into it, but that sort of logic doesn't map well into the deep structures of my brain. In my humble opinion, I don't think it really has much to do with a lot of the rest of mathematics. There's a lot of other cool stuff out there if Principia isn't your cup of tea.
 
I don't think Principia is suited for the average mathematician. I remember mathwonk reviewed it (from a mathematician's standpoint) and basically called it a waste of time lol. If you're just trying to learn math proofs, I'd agree. I never felt comfortable with trying to prove extremely basic things like the commutativity of natural number addition. This never seemed any more or less obvious than the concept of a set, so if I take one for granted, why not the other?

Yeah, I know the basics of natural numbers are classic topics in a first year grad course and that it's better to limit your axioms, but I really don't care. A book taking 100 pages to prove that 1+1=2 just doesn't seem like fun. I guess if you agree then it's not for you.

I like "How to Prove it" by Velleman, and most introductory Linear Algebra books double as a sort of introduction to proofs book, so you may look into those.
 
Tobias Funke said:
I remember mathwonk reviewed it (from a mathematician's standpoint) and basically called it a waste of time lol.

They were hoping to make a complete and consistent system, ridding any paradoxes they knew about. Then a man named Godel came along and...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K