Does Quantum Randomness Disprove the Existence of God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agnostictheist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between quantum mechanics (QM) and the existence of a theistic God, specifically addressing whether quantum randomness undermines the concept of God. Participants clarify that QM does not inherently address theological questions, emphasizing that randomness in quantum systems does not equate to a lack of causation. Key concepts such as Hilbert space, vector spaces, and inner products are introduced, highlighting their significance in understanding quantum mechanics. The conversation underscores the importance of distinguishing scientific inquiry from philosophical debates regarding the existence of God.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly randomness and measurement.
  • Familiarity with Hilbert space and its role in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic knowledge of vector spaces and inner products in linear algebra.
  • Awareness of the philosophical implications of scientific theories.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of Hilbert space in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of inner products in vector spaces and their applications in quantum theory.
  • Explore the implications of quantum randomness on determinism and causation.
  • Investigate the philosophical debates surrounding science and theology, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and theological discussions will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
warren, slightly off topic, in anther thread I mentioned you in that I would like you too read something I wrote to give your input.. I made it clear that these is a philosophical/theological spin to it,, and to a cosomological concept, those I believe non-boundary proposals now seem by some claims to have possible testable results?


can you veiw it, and tell me if its at last reasonible?

its in:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7347&perpage=12&pagenumber=13
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't think it argues against the existence of a god at all. If there is any interaction between a nonphysical god and the physical world it has to occur through some element of random- why couldn't god choose the outcomes of events that are utterly random? Seems logical...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
10K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K