Does Relativistic effect applies to light as well?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nikeadidas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Relativistic
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
nikeadidas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A quick question..a traveller will observe length of his journey contracted if he is traveling in a straight line..thus when light travels, doesn't the distance it travels get contracted?..and since light itself travels at c, ideally the contraction factor should be zero, so light should reach instantly..I am not sure what am I missing..please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If an "observer" were able to travel at the speed of light, distances would be reduced to 0. Further, time would reduced to a standstill. In other words, the is NO usable "frame of reference" at light speed.
 
You surely mean that the contraction factor should be infinite (resulting in zero length).

The equations refer to reference systems and no reference system can reach the speed of light - and infinites would not be very useful. But if one could closely approach the speed of light, indeed one would be at one's destiny "in no time" or instantly. So, perhaps there is nothing that you missed, and you discovered the concept of "time dilation". :smile:

Einstein phrased it as follows:

"For v=c all moving objects—viewed from the “stationary” system—shrivel up into plane figures. [..] we shall [..] find in what follows, that the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."
and
"the time marked by the clock (viewed in the stationary system) is slow by 1-sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} seconds per second".
- http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Note: it could be that there's a thingy with your formulation "get contracted": you should have written "appears to be contracted for the light". It's essential to keep track of who/which system (although light isn't either) measures what and when!