- #1

- 104

- 0

but i think in Wikipedia it its written as the distance undergo length contraction

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox

read the "Specific example" topic in it

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Trojan666ru
- Start date

- #1

- 104

- 0

but i think in Wikipedia it its written as the distance undergo length contraction

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox

read the "Specific example" topic in it

- #2

- 3,962

- 20

but i think in Wikipedia it its written as the distance undergo length contraction

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox

read the "Specific example" topic in it

Yes, distance length contracts. Lay down a set of rulers end to end in a line. Remove every other ruler. Now from the point of view of an observer moving along the line, the gaps between the rulers length contract to the same extent as the rulers themselves.

- #3

- 104

- 0

- #4

- 104

- 0

- #5

- 44

- 1

No, not if you use a frame in which you are at rest. Then there is no length contraction.

If you used the frame in which you are moving and the object is at rest, the distance would be length contracted, so the object would indeed arrive earlier than that (or rather you would arrive at the object earlier), but your clocks would also be running slow due to time dilation. The two effects cancel and so your clocks would read 1 hour and 6 minutes.

- #6

- 3,962

- 20

You measure the distance to be 1 light hour and the time of travel to be ≈ 1 hour 6 minutes.

They measure the distance to be ≈ 26 light minutes and the time of travel to be ≈ 29 minutes.

You both calculate the velocity using your own measurements of distance and time to be 0.9c.

- #7

- 5,601

- 40

So anything traveling in your frame, with you, is 'stationary' relative to you: that means a clock you carry, for example, always ticks at it's same fixed rate [called proper time] and you do not contract in size along the direction of motion. But the other outside observer, in motion relative to you, sees your clock slow and your size diminish along the direction of motion.

So when you move really fast on your way to Alpha Centauri, that distance is in another reference frame....right??....your local wrist watch time ticks along as usual but the distance you travel is reduced. From an observer on Alpha Centauri, the distance remains unchanged [since it is in the static frame of that observer] but she sees your clock ticking more slowly....when you meet up and compare elapsed times, voila they don't agree....she thinks your elapsed local time is less than her local time. YOU have aged less than she.

You each 'disagree' on the elapsed time and distance traveled.....and you are both right.

Different observers resolve these 'paradoxes' via Lorentz transforms which explain the differences.

- #8

- 5,601

- 40

Can you now answer this correctly on your own??

Share: