Does the Definite Integral Equal Zero for a Continuous Function?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mike1988
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Integrals
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether a continuous function f: R to R, satisfying the condition |∫(m to n) f(x) dx| ≤ (n-m)² for every closed bounded interval [m, n], must be identically zero. Participants explore the implications of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and the Mean Value Theorem, concluding that if f is non-zero at any point, it leads to a contradiction due to the properties of continuity. Thus, it is established that f(x) must equal 0 for all x in R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Knowledge of the Mean Value Theorem
  • Familiarity with properties of continuous functions
  • Concept of definite integrals and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Mean Value Theorem in the context of integrals
  • Explore the properties of continuous functions and their behavior over intervals
  • Investigate the concept of contradiction in mathematical proofs
  • Learn about the implications of the continuity of functions on their integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those studying properties of continuous functions and integrals.

mike1988
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Let f : R to R be a continuous function, and suppose that definite integral from m to n |∫(m to n)f(x)dx|≤(n-m)^2 for every closed bounded interval [m, n] in R. Then is it the case that f(x) = 0 for all x in R?

I tried using fundamental theorem of calculus but got stuck, since I only got that F'(x)=f(x)≤ 0.

Any help/suggestion would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think f(x) would be 0? Doesn't make much sense.
 
If f is non-zero at a point a then there exists some b, K > 0 s.t. f(x) > K for all x in [a-b,a+b]. Can you finish the proof?
 
xAxis said:
Why do you think f(x) would be 0? Doesn't make much sense.

At first I thought it was wrong, so was trying to find a counterexample. But I saw this question in a book asks to show that f(x)=0 for all x in R, which means it should be true. I was using Mean Value theorem and fundamental theorem of calc but I am not really heading anywhere with those.

Thanks and any further help will be appreciated!
 
deluks917 said:
If f is non-zero at a point a then there exists some b, K > 0 s.t. f(x) > K for all x in [a-b,a+b]. Can you finish the proof?

I guess I don't really get what this means (are you using the sing-change property of continuity?). I am really stuck!

Thanks
 
mike1988 said:
I guess I don't really get what this means (are you using the sing-change property of continuity?). I am really stuck!

Thanks


Using continuity of f is that the condition is fulfilled, so \,f(x)>K \,\,\forall\,x\in [a-b,a+b]\Longrightarrow \int_{a-b}^{a+b}f(x)dx>K\int_{a-b}^{a+b}dx = 2Kb Can you see now how to finish with a contradiction?

DonAntonio
 
note also if 0<b<c then f(x) >K on [a-c,a+c].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K