Does the following matrix have an inverse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a given matrix, N, has an inverse. The matrix is defined as N = [i, 1; -1, i], and the original poster, Frank, is exploring the implications of the theorem regarding the existence of an inverse matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Frank attempts to use the theorem N N-1 = I to find conditions for the existence of an inverse. He sets up equations based on matrix multiplication but questions whether he can conclude that an inverse does not exist. Other participants suggest considering the determinant and applying algorithms for computing inverses.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and prompting Frank to reconsider his calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but guidance has been offered regarding the use of determinants and algorithms for finding inverses.

Contextual Notes

Frank mentions a potential misunderstanding regarding the identity matrix and expresses uncertainty about his calculations. There is also a note about a concussion affecting one participant's clarity on linear algebra concepts.

frankR
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
N= [i,1;-1,i]

I used this theorem: N N-1 = In

Thus:

[i,1;-1,i]*[a,b:c,d]=[1,1;1,1]

I then found:

ia+c=1
ib+d=1
-a+ic=1
-b+id=1

Can I conclude an inverse does not exist. If so, how?

If not, what do I do?


Thanks,

Frank
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I2 = [1, 0; 0, 1]


What theorems have you learned about invertible matrices? (e.g. have you learned anything about how to tell if a matrix is invertible based on its determinant)


Or, you could apply the algorithm for computing inverses and see if you get an answer or if its impossible.
 
Originally posted by Hurkyl


Or, you could apply the algorithm for computing inverses and see if you get an answer or if its impossible.

I just found this:

N-1 exists only if:

det(NN-1 != 0

I'm a little rusty on my linear algebra, plus I got a concusion yesterday.
 
frankR,
Hurkyl has told you what I2 is, because you got that wrong. Just redo your calculation using Hurkyl's hint and you should be able to answer this easily.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
948
Replies
0
Views
370
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K