Does the following matrix have an inverse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The matrix N = [i, 1; -1, i] does not have an inverse if its determinant is zero. The discussion highlights the use of the theorem N N-1 = I2, where I2 = [1, 0; 0, 1]. Participants emphasize the importance of calculating the determinant to determine invertibility, specifically noting that N-1 exists only if det(N) ≠ 0. The conversation also suggests applying the algorithm for computing inverses to verify the existence of an inverse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically multiplication and determinants.
  • Familiarity with the concept of invertible matrices in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of the identity matrix, particularly I2 = [1, 0; 0, 1].
  • Ability to apply the algorithm for computing matrix inverses.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the determinant of a 2x2 matrix.
  • Study the properties of invertible matrices and their implications in linear algebra.
  • Practice the algorithm for computing inverses of matrices.
  • Explore the relationship between matrix rank and invertibility.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in computational mathematics or engineering requiring matrix operations.

frankR
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
N= [i,1;-1,i]

I used this theorem: N N-1 = In

Thus:

[i,1;-1,i]*[a,b:c,d]=[1,1;1,1]

I then found:

ia+c=1
ib+d=1
-a+ic=1
-b+id=1

Can I conclude an inverse does not exist. If so, how?

If not, what do I do?


Thanks,

Frank
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I2 = [1, 0; 0, 1]


What theorems have you learned about invertible matrices? (e.g. have you learned anything about how to tell if a matrix is invertible based on its determinant)


Or, you could apply the algorithm for computing inverses and see if you get an answer or if its impossible.
 
Originally posted by Hurkyl


Or, you could apply the algorithm for computing inverses and see if you get an answer or if its impossible.

I just found this:

N-1 exists only if:

det(NN-1 != 0

I'm a little rusty on my linear algebra, plus I got a concusion yesterday.
 
frankR,
Hurkyl has told you what I2 is, because you got that wrong. Just redo your calculation using Hurkyl's hint and you should be able to answer this easily.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K