Does the Higgs Boson really have 0 spin?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the spin of the Higgs Boson, specifically whether it is definitively 0 or if it could be between 0 and 1/2 times a specific constant. The scope includes theoretical implications and measurement challenges related to particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the Higgs Boson truly has 0 spin or if it could be a fractional value, suggesting a range between 0 and 1/2 times a specific constant.
  • Another participant asserts that the Higgs Boson has spin-0, referencing a previous discussion on the topic.
  • A third participant comments on the resilience of the Standard Model, noting its longevity in the field of physics.
  • Some participants raise the issue of measurement errors in determining spin, questioning the relevance of measuring spin for a scalar particle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the spin of the Higgs Boson, with no consensus reached regarding its value or the implications of measuring it.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the accuracy of spin measurements and the theoretical implications of the Higgs Boson's spin value.

jwb44
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Does the Higgs Boson really have 0 spin or is the spin between 0 and 1/2 x (1.054 571 817... x 10-34 J s)?
Does the Higgs Boson really have 0 spin or is the spin between 0 and 1/2 x (1.054 571 817... x 10-34 J s)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really has spin-0. Just like it did on Saturday when you asked then.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Umang Soni and vanhees71
This shows, how persistent the Standard Model is. It survives for a whole week ;-) (in fact about 60 years yet).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
But leaving theory aside, there's always an error in measurement of spin, isn't there? :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Demystifier said:
But leaving theory aside, there's always an error in measurement of spin, isn't there? :smile:
Who cares about measuring the spin of spin-less scalar? :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K