Does the Neutral Axis Move in a Symmetrical Beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ripson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Neutral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the Neutral Axis (NA) in a symmetrical beam subjected to a vertical load. When a downward load is applied at the center of a simply supported beam, the NA does shift slightly due to the effects of tension and compression, although this movement is often negligible in conventional beam bending analysis. The deformation of the cross-section is influenced by Poisson's ratio, causing the tension side to narrow and the compression side to widen. Overall, while the NA does move, it is not significant enough to impact standard engineering calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam mechanics and bending theory
  • Familiarity with Poisson's ratio and its effects on materials
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in structural analysis
  • Basic concepts of tensile and compressive stress in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of beam bending and the Neutral Axis in detail
  • Explore the implications of Poisson's ratio in structural engineering
  • Learn about the effects of distributed loads on beam deflection
  • Investigate advanced beam analysis techniques, such as finite element analysis (FEA)
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in beam design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

ripson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi

Consider a symmetrical beam, where as we know the Neutral Axis (NA) would be at the Geometric Center. If that beam was simply supported at both ends, there would be equal tension and compression to ensure that beam was in equilibrium.

Now if we applied a vertical load, downwards, in the center, the beam would sag and be in compression at the top and tension on the bottom. My question is: Would the NA move to accommodate the increase in tension on the bottom surface? If it doesn't, how can this be, as tension has increased?

Thanks in advance...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi

Consider a symmetrical beam, where as we know the Neutral Axis (NA) would be at the Geometric Center. If that beam was simply supported at both ends, there would be equal tension and compression to ensure that beam was in equilibrium.

Now if we applied a vertical load, downwards, in the center, the beam would sag and be in compression at the top and tension on the bottom. My question is: Would the NA move to accommodate the increase in tension on the bottom surface? If it doesn't, how can this be, as tension has increased?

Thanks in advance...
 
Yes it does, but not enough to bother about if you are doing a conventional beam bending analysis.

The cross section also deforms because of Poisson's ratio. The tension side gets narrower, the compression side gets wider, and the top and bottom surfaces curve (anti-clastic curvature).

You can see this easily if you bend short, thick, flexible beam - e.g. a rectangular-block-shaped pencil eraser.
 
Well, the term "neutral axis" refers to a situation where the beam *is* loaded. What exactly is your question?
 
Thanks AlephZero.

Good point about Possion's Ratio, I never really appreciated that in beam bending. Thanks for the eraser analogy too, I like to keep things simple.

So just to confirm, when the beam is relaxed, in equilibrium, there will be no stress at the top or the bottom. But when it hogs, we get compression on the top and tension on the bottom. My friend was saying that there is always some stress on the top and bottom, but I can't see this.

Thanks again...
 
It depends on just how technical you want to get in regards to what your friend is saying. Technically, every beam will deflect slightly under its own weight. So in that context, yes. There is always a slight tensile and compressive stress in a beam.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
22K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K